Mathias Gutmann

462 citations
33 papers · 103 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Mathias Gutmann

24 papers receiving 92 citations

Peers

Mathias Gutmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • History and Philosophy of Science 24
  • Safety Research 13
  • Paleontology 7
  • Social Psychology 18
  • Health Informatics 1
Replace Susan G. Sterrett with:
Susan G. Sterrett United States
Thierry Hoquet France
Marco J. Nathan United States
Joseph LaPorte United States
Thomas A. Fogle United States
Richard G. Delisle Canada
Jonathan Hodge United Kingdom
Joel Pust United States
Georg Toepfer Germany
Miguel García-Sancho United Kingdom
Mathias Gutmann relative to Susan G. Sterrett United States Susan G. Sterrett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Susan G. Sterrett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mathias Gutmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathias Gutmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathias Gutmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathias Gutmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mathias Gutmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathias Gutmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathias Gutmann. The network helps show where Mathias Gutmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Mathias Gutmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mathias Gutmann Line = papers co-authored together Mathias Gutmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201121
2
Robo- and Informationethics: Some Fundamentals
201211
3 20029
4 20029
5 20008
6 20007
7 20175
8 20204
9 19963
10 20083
11 20023
12 20203
13
Concepts of Functional, Engineering and Constructional - Morphology
20022
14 20112
15 19981
16 20151
17 20081
18 20051
19 20041
20 20081

About Mathias Gutmann

Mathias Gutmann is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Molecular Biology and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 103 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers), German Social Sciences and History (2 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers), Origins and Evolution of Life (2 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (2 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (2 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (1 paper) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (24 citations), Safety Research (13 citations), Paleontology (7 citations), Social Psychology (18 citations) and Health Informatics (1 citation). Mathias Gutmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Joachim Scholz, Rüdiger Dillmann, Martin Fischer, Ingrid Ott, Michael Decker, Thomas Dreier, Armin Grünwald, Marco Tamborini, Michael Bölker and Michael Weingarten. Their work appears in journals such as Theory in Biosciences, Sign Systems Studies, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact