Mathew Tollefson
About
In The Last Decade
Mathew Tollefson
4 papers receiving 46 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
- Surgery 33
- Urology 22
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 14
- Oncology 6
- Rheumatology 6
Countries citing papers authored by Mathew Tollefson
This map shows the geographic impact of Mathew Tollefson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathew Tollefson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathew Tollefson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mathew Tollefson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathew Tollefson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathew Tollefson. The network helps show where Mathew Tollefson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mathew Tollefson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mathew Tollefson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mathew Tollefson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mathew Tollefson. Mathew Tollefson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.