C. Pirès

409 total citations
13 papers, 58 citations indexed

About

C. Pirès is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Urology. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Pirès has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 58 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 4 papers in Surgery and 3 papers in Urology. Recurrent topics in C. Pirès's work include Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (4 papers) and Ureteral procedures and complications (2 papers). C. Pirès is often cited by papers focused on Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (4 papers) and Ureteral procedures and complications (2 papers). C. Pirès collaborates with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Brazil. C. Pirès's co-authors include B. Doré, Jacques Irani, F. Bruyère, Stéphanie Ragot, P. Coloby, R. Gil, Benoît Merlet, S. Larré, Guillaume Normand and Gaëlle Fromont and has published in prestigious journals such as European Urology Supplements, Progrès en Urologie and Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité.

In The Last Decade

C. Pirès

12 papers receiving 56 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. Pirès France 5 27 23 17 17 10 13 58
Antonio Aliberti Italy 3 21 0.8× 9 0.4× 23 1.4× 10 0.6× 17 1.7× 6 47
Katherine Palmieri United States 3 14 0.5× 5 0.2× 23 1.4× 17 1.0× 12 1.2× 5 53
Xavier Delforge France 5 32 1.2× 11 0.5× 6 0.4× 6 0.4× 6 0.6× 9 65
Christophe Ghysel Belgium 4 38 1.4× 15 0.7× 26 1.5× 28 1.6× 2 0.2× 15 55
A. Nic An Riogh Ireland 4 28 1.0× 7 0.3× 17 1.0× 28 1.6× 6 0.6× 9 46
J Ampe Belgium 4 19 0.7× 8 0.3× 13 0.8× 16 0.9× 3 0.3× 12 39
Summaya Saeed Pakistan 5 19 0.7× 14 0.6× 5 0.3× 6 0.4× 3 0.3× 12 36
Jules Kohaut France 8 82 3.0× 58 2.5× 20 1.2× 2 0.1× 6 0.6× 12 130
T. Twistington Higgins Sweden 5 24 0.9× 47 2.0× 12 0.7× 31 1.8× 12 1.2× 6 81
Vania Silvestri Italy 6 61 2.3× 39 1.7× 17 1.0× 3 0.2× 5 0.5× 17 94

Countries citing papers authored by C. Pirès

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Pirès's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Pirès with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Pirès more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Pirès

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Pirès. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Pirès. The network helps show where C. Pirès may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Pirès

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Pirès. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Pirès based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Pirès. C. Pirès is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Pirès, C., et al.. (2020). Finalidade e Atividades da Curadoria Digital na Perspectiva de sua Implantação em uma Instituição. Brazilian Journal of Information Science research trends. 14(4). e020012–e020012. 2 indexed citations
2.
Pirès, C.. (2013). Desenvolvimento de uma calculadora baseada numa FPGA e num VGA. Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT).
3.
Doré, B., et al.. (2013). Prostatectomie radicale ouverte versus laparoscopique : expérience d’un centre français. Progrès en Urologie. 24(3). 173–179. 1 indexed citations
6.
Pirès, C., et al.. (2011). Fistule urogénitale obstétricale : à propos de deux observations en France. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 39(5). 328–331. 3 indexed citations
7.
Pirès, C., et al.. (2011). Efficacité et tolérance des dilatations par autosondages après urétrotomie interne pour sténoses urétrales. Progrès en Urologie. 21(13). 955–960. 8 indexed citations
8.
Fromont, Gaëlle, et al.. (2011). Néphrectomie partielle par chirurgie conventionnelle : définir les critères de la chirurgie mini-invasive. Progrès en Urologie. 21(13). 917–924. 1 indexed citations
9.
Pirès, C., et al.. (2009). Prise en charge chirurgicale de l’endométriose de l’appareil urinaire : à propos de 12 cas. Progrès en Urologie. 19(11). 850–857. 2 indexed citations
10.
Normand, Guillaume, et al.. (2009). Pourcentage de biopsies positives chez les patients traités par hormonothérapie pour cancer de la prostate : valeur pronostique. Progrès en Urologie. 19(5). 321–326. 1 indexed citations
11.
Merlet, Benoît, Guillaume Normand, P. Coloby, et al.. (2008). Antibioprophylaxie courte versus longue pour les biopsies prostatiques. Étude prospective randomisée multicentrique. Progrès en Urologie. 19(1). 39–46. 15 indexed citations
12.
Ragot, Stéphanie, et al.. (2008). Effet de la suppression androgénique par agonistes de la LH-RH sur les fonctions cognitives de patients atteints de cancer de prostate. Progrès en Urologie. 19(1). 47–53. 10 indexed citations
13.
Merlet, Benoît, O. Celhay, P. Coloby, et al.. (2008). SINGLE PRE-OPERATIVE DOSE RANDOMISED AGAINST 3-DAY ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS FOR TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY: MORE IS NOT BETTER. European Urology Supplements. 7(3). 272–272. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026