Countries where authors publish in Prostate Cancer
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Prostate Cancer. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Prostate Cancer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Prostate Cancer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Prostate Cancer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Prostate Cancer.
About Prostate Cancer
The 368 papers published in Prostate Cancer in the last decades have received a total of 4.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Prostate Cancer usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (276 papers), Cancer Research (56 papers), Urology (18 papers), Rheumatology (42 papers) and Oncology (72 papers) specifically the topics of Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (219 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (187 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (44 papers), Urologic and reproductive health conditions (37 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (24 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (21 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (20 papers) and Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Prostate Cancer are Simone Giona, Helmut Bonkhoff, Bart O. Williams, Kenneth C. Valkenburg, Gerald M. Y. Quan, Teresa Amaral, Luís Heitor Costa, Daniela Macedo, Isabel Fernandes and Matthew Sean Peach.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.