Mary R. Williams
- Safety Research top 1%
- Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods 29
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 10
- Analytical Chemistry top 5%
- Toxicology top 5%
-
- Fire Detection and Safety Systems 6
- Fire dynamics and safety research 4
-
- Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies 7
-
- Geophysical Methods and Applications 4
-
- Fire effects on ecosystems 4
-
- Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications 4
- Co-authors
- Michael E. SigmanJessica L. Frisch‐DaielloCatherine D. ClarkJean M. MacInnisK. M. GohTaylor WoodGabriel Vivó‐TruyolsMartin Lopatka
- Journals
- Analytical Chemistry (3 papers)Analytica Chimica Acta (1 paper)International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew ZealandNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Mary R. Williams
38 papers receiving 687 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Safety Research 394
- Spectroscopy 280
- Analytical Chemistry 149
- Toxicology 45
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 107
Countries citing papers authored by Mary R. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary R. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary R. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary R. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary R. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary R. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary R. Williams. The network helps show where Mary R. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Mary R. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 35 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 33 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 42 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 18 | |
| 17 | The National Center for Forensic Science Ignitable Liquids Reference Collection and Database | 2006 | 8 |
| 18 | 2006 | 44 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 10 | |
| 20 | 1982 | 7 |
About Mary R. Williams
Mary R. Williams is a scholar working on Safety Research, Chemical Health and Safety and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 39 papers that have together received 731 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (29 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (7 papers), Fire Detection and Safety Systems (6 papers), Geophysical Methods and Applications (4 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (4 papers), Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Fire dynamics and safety research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (394 citations), Spectroscopy (280 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (149 citations). Mary R. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Michael E. Sigman, Jessica L. Frisch‐Daiello, Catherine D. Clark, Jean M. MacInnis, K. M. Goh, Taylor Wood, Gabriel Vivó‐Truyols, Martin Lopatka, Marjan Sjerps and Candice Bridge. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Analytica Chimica Acta and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.