Mary R. Williams
- Safety Research top 1%
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry top 5%
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality top 5%
- Co-authors
- Michael E. SigmanJessica L. Frisch‐DaielloCatherine D. ClarkJean M. MacInnisK. M. GohTaylor WoodGabriel Vivó‐TruyolsMartin Lopatka
- Topics
- Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (29 papers)Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (10 papers)Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (7 papers)
- Journals
- Analytical ChemistryAnalytica Chimica ActaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew ZealandNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Mary R. Williams
38 papers receiving 687 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Safety Research 394
- Spectroscopy 280
- Biomedical Engineering 213
- Analytical Chemistry 149
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 107
Countries citing papers authored by Mary R. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary R. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary R. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary R. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary R. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary R. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary R. Williams. The network helps show where Mary R. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary R. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary R. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary R. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary R. Williams. Mary R. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 35 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 33 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 35 | |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | The National Center for Forensic Science Ignitable Liquids Reference Collection and Database | 8 |
| 18 | 44 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Mary R. Williams
Mary R. Williams is a scholar working on Safety Research, Chemical Health and Safety and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 39 papers that have together received 731 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (29 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (10 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (394 citations), Spectroscopy (280 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (149 citations). Mary R. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Michael E. Sigman, Jessica L. Frisch‐Daiello, Catherine D. Clark, Jean M. MacInnis, K. M. Goh, Taylor Wood, Gabriel Vivó‐Truyols, Martin Lopatka, Marjan Sjerps and Candice Bridge. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Analytica Chimica Acta and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.