Mary Phillips

1.5k total citations
36 papers, 686 citations indexed

About

Mary Phillips is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary Phillips has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 686 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Surgery, 14 papers in Oncology and 8 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Mary Phillips's work include Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (16 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (14 papers) and Nutrition and Health in Aging (7 papers). Mary Phillips is often cited by papers focused on Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (16 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (14 papers) and Nutrition and Health in Aging (7 papers). Mary Phillips collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Mary Phillips's co-authors include J. Enrique Domínguez‐Muñoz, Björn Lindkvist, J. Enrique Domínguez‐Muñoz, Timothy R. Graeff, R. V. Coxon, Rajesh Kumar, Luca Gianotti, Jeanin E. van Hooft, Mihailo Bezmarević and Henrik Højgaard Rasmussen and has published in prestigious journals such as Biochemical Journal, British Journal of Cancer and Nutrients.

In The Last Decade

Mary Phillips

34 papers receiving 642 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary Phillips United Kingdom 13 404 242 127 103 68 36 686
Asma Pourhoseingholi Iran 13 282 0.7× 172 0.7× 75 0.6× 83 0.8× 47 0.7× 60 739
Lisa M. Wintner Austria 15 85 0.2× 383 1.6× 62 0.5× 50 0.5× 95 1.4× 38 739
Malcolm C.A. Puntis United Kingdom 10 309 0.8× 189 0.8× 80 0.6× 39 0.4× 75 1.1× 14 577
Bijan Moghimi-Dehkordi Iran 22 500 1.2× 578 2.4× 123 1.0× 142 1.4× 77 1.1× 67 1.4k
Ellen Provost United States 18 97 0.2× 381 1.6× 92 0.7× 113 1.1× 143 2.1× 38 944
Primal P. Singh New Zealand 12 558 1.4× 168 0.7× 83 0.7× 76 0.7× 67 1.0× 21 745
Courtney Schlusser United States 9 326 0.8× 200 0.8× 30 0.2× 74 0.7× 39 0.6× 11 667
Emily K. Robinson United States 14 135 0.3× 137 0.6× 38 0.3× 56 0.5× 153 2.3× 25 577
Dimitrios A. Koutoukidis United Kingdom 16 90 0.2× 253 1.0× 245 1.9× 323 3.1× 91 1.3× 47 900
Kristina Chen United States 18 284 0.7× 77 0.3× 65 0.5× 32 0.3× 14 0.2× 52 726

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Phillips. The network helps show where Mary Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Phillips

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Phillips. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Phillips based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Phillips. Mary Phillips is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Arvanitakis, Marianna, Johann Ockenga, Mihailo Bezmarević, et al.. (2023). ESPEN practical guideline on clinical nutrition in acute and chronic pancreatitis. Clinical Nutrition. 43(2). 395–412. 18 indexed citations
3.
Phillips, Mary, Rajesh Kumar, Rajiv Lahiri, et al.. (2023). Bedside naso-jejunal placement is more difficult, but successful in patients with COVID-19 in critical care: A retrospective service evaluation of a dietitian-led service. Journal of the Intensive Care Society. 24(4). 435–437. 1 indexed citations
4.
Halle‐Smith, James, Sarah Powell‐Brett, Sinead N. Duggan, et al.. (2023). Recent Advances in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Strategies to Optimise the Perioperative Nutritional Status in Pancreatoduodenectomy Patients. Cancers. 15(9). 2466–2466. 2 indexed citations
5.
Powell‐Brett, Sarah, et al.. (2023). Comprehensive, long-term evaluation of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency after pancreatoduodenectomy. Pancreatology. 24(2). 298–305. 3 indexed citations
6.
Phillips, Mary, Kathryn Hart, Adam E. Frampton, & M. Denise Robertson. (2023). Do Patients Benefit from Micronutrient Supplementation following Pancreatico-Duodenectomy?. Nutrients. 15(12). 2804–2804. 1 indexed citations
7.
Grammatikopoulos, Tassos, Damian J. Mole, Andrew D. Hopper, et al.. (2023). The top 10 research priorities for pancreatitis: findings from a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership. ˜The œLancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology. 8(9). 780–782. 4 indexed citations
8.
Sharp, Linda, Keno Mentor, Jennifer Deane, et al.. (2023). Assessing impact, needs and quality-of-life among informal carers of people with pancreatic cancer, a prospective study: the PAN-CARER study protocol. BMJ Open. 13(5). e068178–e068178. 4 indexed citations
9.
Phillips, Mary, et al.. (2022). Long-term effects of clinical interventions on nutritional status in patients with chronic pancreatitis - A systematic review. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN. 48. 178–185. 3 indexed citations
10.
Phillips, Mary, Neil Smith, Simon McPherson, & Derek O’Reilly. (2021). Nutritional assessment and management in acute pancreatitis: Ongoing lessons of the NCEPOD report. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. 35(3). 504–511. 1 indexed citations
11.
Phillips, Mary, et al.. (2021). Long-term changes in nutritional status and body composition in patients with malignant pancreatic disease - A systematic review. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN. 44. 85–95. 6 indexed citations
12.
Arvanitakis, Marianna, Johann Ockenga, Mihailo Bezmarević, et al.. (2020). ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in acute and chronic pancreatitis. Clinical Nutrition. 39(3). 612–631. 137 indexed citations
13.
Domínguez‐Muñoz, J. Enrique & Mary Phillips. (2017). Nutritional Therapy in Chronic Pancreatitis. Gastroenterology Clinics of North America. 47(1). 95–106. 45 indexed citations
14.
Phillips, Mary. (2015). Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency following pancreatic resection. Pancreatology. 15(5). 449–455. 58 indexed citations
16.
Phillips, Mary, Paul D. Curtis, & N D Karanjia. (2004). An elemental diet for bowel obstruction in pregnancy: a case study. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. 17(6). 543–545. 4 indexed citations
17.
Phillips, Mary, et al.. (2004). Healing and mental health for Native Americans : speaking in red. 48 indexed citations
18.
Phillips, Mary, et al.. (2003). Alcohol and Health Disparities in Nonreservation American Indian Communities. Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research. 27(8). 1333–1336. 12 indexed citations
19.
Phillips, Mary. (1999). Should Practice on a Medical-Surgical Unit be a Prerequisite for New Graduates Who Want to be Labor and Delivery Nurses?. MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing. 24(6). 278–278. 1 indexed citations
20.
Phillips, Mary, et al.. (1994). Grease Gun Injuries to the Orbit and Adnexa. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 10(3). 211–215. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026