Keno Mentor

548 total citations
7 papers, 345 citations indexed

About

Keno Mentor is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Keno Mentor has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 345 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Oncology, 3 papers in Surgery and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Keno Mentor's work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (4 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (2 papers) and Family Support in Illness (2 papers). Keno Mentor is often cited by papers focused on Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (4 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (2 papers) and Family Support in Illness (2 papers). Keno Mentor collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Ireland. Keno Mentor's co-authors include Cliona O’Farrelly, Justin Geoghegan, Cathal Harmon, Fiona Hand, Mark W. Robinson, Emir Hoti, Diarmaid D. Houlihan, Lydia Lynch, Sanjay Pandanaboyana and Linda Sharp and has published in prestigious journals such as BMJ Open, World Journal of Surgery and Cancer Immunology Research.

In The Last Decade

Keno Mentor

7 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Keno Mentor United Kingdom	5	156	127	113	92	43	7	345
Isabelle Himsl Germany	8	80 0.5×	103 0.8×	62 0.5×	81 0.9×	71 1.7×	14	363
Aik Seng Ng United Kingdom	7	39 0.3×	176 1.4×	93 0.8×	163 1.8×	52 1.2×	10	405
Emiel A. De Jaeghere Belgium	9	93 0.6×	166 1.3×	52 0.5×	87 0.9×	40 0.9×	17	320
Nicole E. James United States	12	71 0.5×	91 0.7×	81 0.7×	75 0.8×	40 0.9×	32	298
Torben Wilms Sweden	12	50 0.3×	151 1.2×	145 1.3×	199 2.2×	41 1.0×	19	379
Maxim Norkin United States	12	53 0.3×	148 1.2×	32 0.3×	86 0.9×	20 0.5×	35	396
Shannon Grabosch United States	7	170 1.1×	150 1.2×	32 0.3×	87 0.9×	38 0.9×	15	326
S.Y. Chui United States	7	79 0.5×	306 2.4×	110 1.0×	58 0.6×	8 0.2×	8	426
Hanneke WM van Laarhoven Netherlands	10	31 0.2×	101 0.8×	63 0.6×	105 1.1×	75 1.7×	18	351
Huaijun Zhou China	14	62 0.4×	88 0.7×	242 2.1×	291 3.2×	26 0.6×	38	523

Countries citing papers authored by Keno Mentor

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keno Mentor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keno Mentor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keno Mentor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keno Mentor

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keno Mentor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keno Mentor. The network helps show where Keno Mentor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keno Mentor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keno Mentor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keno Mentor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keno Mentor. Keno Mentor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Sharp, Linda, Keno Mentor, Jennifer Deane, et al.. (2023). Assessing impact, needs and quality-of-life among informal carers of people with pancreatic cancer, a prospective study: the PAN-CARER study protocol. BMJ Open. 13(5). e068178–e068178. 4 indexed citations

2.

Mentor, Keno, et al.. (2022). Body surface gastric mapping to determine gastric motility patterns associated with delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Gastric Electric Mapping after Pancreatoduodenectomy study protocol. BMJ Open. 12(12). e066864–e066864. 1 indexed citations

3.

Crowe, Lisa, et al.. (2022). Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer. 31(1). 74–74. 42 indexed citations

4.

Wang, Tim Hsu‐Han, Tony Lin, Keno Mentor, Gregory O’Grady, & Sanjay Pandanaboyana. (2022). Delayed Gastric Emptying and Gastric Remnant Function After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review of Objective Assessment Modalities. World Journal of Surgery. 47(1). 236–259. 8 indexed citations

5.

Wells, Cameron I., Bathiya Ratnayake, Keno Mentor, et al.. (2020). Haemostatic Efficacy of Topical Agents During Liver Resection: A Network Meta‐Analysis of Randomised Trials. World Journal of Surgery. 44(10). 3461–3469. 12 indexed citations

6.

Mentor, Keno, Bathiya Ratnayake, Giorgio Alessandri, et al.. (2020). Meta‐Analysis and Meta‐Regression of Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infections in Hepatic and Pancreatic Resection. World Journal of Surgery. 44(12). 4221–4230. 20 indexed citations

7.

Harmon, Cathal, Mark W. Robinson, Fiona Hand, et al.. (2018). Lactate-Mediated Acidification of Tumor Microenvironment Induces Apoptosis of Liver-Resident NK Cells in Colorectal Liver Metastasis. Cancer Immunology Research. 7(2). 335–346. 258 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact