Mary M. Conte
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Emergency Medicine top 2%
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Papers in
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 37
- Neural dynamics and brain function 20
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 8
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 6
- Aesthetic Perception and Analysis 5
- Co-authors
- Jonathan D. VictorNicholas D. SchiffAndrew M. GoldfineHenning U. VossP ForgácsEsteban A. FridmanRuth NassLeslie A. Burton
- Journals
- Vision Research (19 papers)Journal of Vision (7 papers)Visual Neuroscience (6 papers)Journal of the Optical Society of America A (2 papers)eLife (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustriaBelgium
In The Last Decade
Mary M. Conte
53 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.0k
- Emergency Medicine 257
- Neurology 245
- Epidemiology 472
- Psychiatry and Mental health 153
Countries citing papers authored by Mary M. Conte
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary M. Conte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary M. Conte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary M. Conte more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary M. Conte
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary M. Conte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary M. Conte. The network helps show where Mary M. Conte may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary M. Conte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 182 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 26 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 15 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 33 | |
| 14 | Isodipole textures: a window on cortical mechanisms of form processing | 1995 | 6 |
| 15 | 1994 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1992 | 26 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 15 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 72 | |
| 20 | 1989 | 45 |
About Mary M. Conte
Mary M. Conte is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Architecture, Neurology, Emergency Medicine and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (37 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (20 papers), Color Science and Applications (11 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (8 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (8 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (7 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers) and Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Emergency Medicine (257 citations), Neurology (245 citations), Epidemiology (472 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (153 citations). Mary M. Conte has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan D. Victor, Nicholas D. Schiff, Andrew M. Goldfine, Henning U. Voss, P Forgács, Esteban A. Fridman, Ruth Nass, Leslie A. Burton, Charles Chubb and Ethan Taub. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, Journal of Vision, Visual Neuroscience, Journal of the Optical Society of America A and eLife.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.