Mary Jane Collier

54 total papers · 1.1k total citations
39 papers, 600 citations indexed

About

Mary Jane Collier is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary Jane Collier has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 600 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Social Psychology, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Mary Jane Collier's work include Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (7 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (7 papers) and Rhetoric and Communication Studies (5 papers). Mary Jane Collier is often cited by papers focused on Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (7 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (7 papers) and Rhetoric and Communication Studies (5 papers). Mary Jane Collier collaborates with scholars based in United States, Russia and Trinidad and Tobago. Mary Jane Collier's co-authors include Michael L. Hecht, Sidney A. Ribeau, R G Powell, Yea‐Wen Chen, Brandi Lawless, Benjamin J. Broome, Bertram D. Cohen, Elirea Bornman, J. C. Thompson and John  and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Development, Scientific American and American Behavioral Scientist.

In The Last Decade

Mary Jane Collier

37 papers receiving 495 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Mary Jane Collier 223 192 174 173 132 39 600
Fred L. Casmir 159 0.7× 183 1.0× 167 1.0× 77 0.4× 113 0.9× 31 507
Wendy Leeds‐Hurwitz 127 0.6× 182 0.9× 106 0.6× 83 0.5× 161 1.2× 33 598
Robert Shuter 203 0.9× 211 1.1× 226 1.3× 88 0.5× 88 0.7× 34 569
Rona Tamiko Halualani 95 0.4× 248 1.3× 164 0.9× 172 1.0× 55 0.4× 26 515
Jeffery Scott Mio 302 1.4× 188 1.0× 79 0.5× 72 0.4× 64 0.5× 30 670
Todd L. Sandel 133 0.6× 322 1.7× 125 0.7× 107 0.6× 97 0.7× 43 643
Yea‐Wen Chen 143 0.6× 243 1.3× 110 0.6× 143 0.8× 28 0.2× 51 577
Shi‐xu 56 0.3× 214 1.1× 131 0.8× 79 0.5× 194 1.5× 32 605
James W. Chesebro 149 0.7× 149 0.8× 230 1.3× 58 0.3× 46 0.3× 48 645
Jo Sprague 338 1.5× 114 0.6× 52 0.3× 299 1.7× 44 0.3× 21 589

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Jane Collier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Jane Collier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Jane Collier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Jane Collier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Jane Collier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Jane Collier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Jane Collier. The network helps show where Mary Jane Collier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Jane Collier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Jane Collier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Jane Collier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Jane Collier. Mary Jane Collier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026