Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The main sequence, a tool for studying human eye movements
1975873 citationsA. Terry Bahill, Lawrence Stark et al.profile →
Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movements
1975662 citationsLawrence Stark et al.Vision Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Lawrence Stark
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Lawrence Stark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lawrence Stark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lawrence Stark more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lawrence Stark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lawrence Stark. The network helps show where Lawrence Stark may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lawrence Stark
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lawrence Stark.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lawrence Stark based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lawrence Stark. Lawrence Stark is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kim, Won S., Frank Tendick, & Lawrence Stark. (1989). Visual enhancements in pick-and-place tasks: Human operators controlling a simulated cylindrical manipulator. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 265–282.3 indexed citations
7.
Ciuffreda, Kenneth J., Robert V. Kenyon, & Lawrence Stark. (1985). Eye Movements during Reading. Optometry and Vision Science. 62(12). 844–852.16 indexed citations
Stark, Lawrence, et al.. (1980). Disparity Vergence. Optometry and Vision Science. 57(9). 606–609.20 indexed citations
10.
Kenyon, Robert V., Kenneth J. Ciuffreda, & Lawrence Stark. (1980). Unequal Saccades during Vergence. Optometry and Vision Science. 57(9). 586–594.56 indexed citations
11.
Ciuffreda, Kenneth J., Robert V. Kenyon, & Lawrence Stark. (1979). Abnormal saccadic substitution during small-amplitude pursuit tracking in amblyopic eyes.. PubMed. 18(5). 506–16.28 indexed citations
Ciuffreda, Kenneth J., Robert V. Kenyon, & Lawrence Stark. (1978). Processing Delays in Amblyopic Eyes. Optometry and Vision Science. 55(3). 187–196.25 indexed citations
Stark, Lawrence, A. Terry Bahill, Kenneth J. Ciuffreda, Robert V. Kenyon, & Stephen Phillips. (1977). Neuro-optometry. Optometry and Vision Science. 53(7). 85–96.15 indexed citations
Ciuffreda, Kenneth J., A. Terry Bahill, Robert V. Kenyon, & Lawrence Stark. (1976). Eye Movements during Reading. Optometry and Vision Science. 53(8). 389–395.47 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.