Mary Grant
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Occupational Therapy top 5%
- Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Papers in
-
- Workplace Health and Well-being 5
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 3
-
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 6
- Co-authors
- Kate Radford (5 shared papers)Emma Sinclair (4 shared papers)Martin Underwood (3 shared papers)Robert Froud (3 shared papers)Carol Coole (1 shared paper)Kate Seers (2 shared papers)Sophie Rees (1 shared paper)Marion Walker (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMJ Open (3 papers)British Journal of Occupational Therapy (3 papers)Journal of Religion and Health (1 paper)International Journal of Nursing Studies (1 paper)Disability and Rehabilitation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNorwayUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mary Grant
20 papers receiving 327 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Rehabilitation 99
- Occupational Therapy 33
- Pharmacology 120
- General Health Professions 138
- Medical Laboratory Technology 6
Countries citing papers authored by Mary Grant
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Grant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Grant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Grant more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Grant
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Grant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Grant. The network helps show where Mary Grant may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary Grant, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 51 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 20 | Practising Evidence-Based Child Health | 2000 | 1 |
About Mary Grant
Mary Grant is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pharmacology, Rehabilitation, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 20 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (3 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (99 citations), Occupational Therapy (33 citations), Pharmacology (120 citations), General Health Professions (138 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (6 citations). Mary Grant has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kate Radford, Emma Sinclair, Martin Underwood, Robert Froud, Carol Coole, Kate Seers, Sophie Rees, Marion Walker, Fergus Gracey and Safiya George Dalmida. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Journal of Religion and Health, International Journal of Nursing Studies and Disability and Rehabilitation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.