Mary G. Enig
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Food Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Co-authors
- J. SampugnaHarry G. PreussMark KeeneyShari LiebermanBobby EchardThomas B. ElliottItzhak BrookLuke A. Pallansch
- Topics
- Fatty Acid Research and Health (5 papers)Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (4 papers)Coconut Research and Applications (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Chromatography AJournal of the American Oil Chemists SocietyMolecular and Cellular Biochemistry
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mary G. Enig
12 papers receiving 589 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Nutrition and Dietetics 284
- Food Science 190
- Molecular Biology 105
- Plant Science 93
- Biochemistry 80
Countries citing papers authored by Mary G. Enig
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary G. Enig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary G. Enig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary G. Enig more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary G. Enig
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary G. Enig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary G. Enig. The network helps show where Mary G. Enig may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary G. Enig
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary G. Enig. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary G. Enig based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary G. Enig. Mary G. Enig is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | Health and nutritional benefits from coconut oil and its advantages over competing oils. | 12 |
| 3 | 117 | |
| 4 | 33 | |
| 5 | 142 | |
| 6 | Dangers of Statin Drugs: What You Haven't Been Told About Popular Cholesterol-Lowering Medicines | 1 |
| 7 | Nourishing Traditions: The Cookbook that Challenges Politically Correct Nutrition and the Diet Dictocrats | 23 |
| 8 | 119 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 107 | |
| 11 | 61 | |
| 12 | 9 |
About Mary G. Enig
Mary G. Enig is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Food Science and Biochemistry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 659 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fatty Acid Research and Health (5 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (4 papers) and Coconut Research and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (284 citations), Biochemistry (80 citations) and Food Science (190 citations). Mary G. Enig has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include J. Sampugna, Harry G. Preuss, Mark Keeney, Shari Lieberman, Bobby Echard, Thomas B. Elliott, Itzhak Brook, Luke A. Pallansch, Vijaya Manohar and Debasis Bagchi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society and Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.