Mary Forhan

67 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Mary Forhan's Hit Papers

Weight bias and health care utilization: a scoping review 2019 · 196 citations
1960+2+4Years since publication50100150

Peers

Mary Forhan
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Pharmacy 637
  • Occupational Therapy 138
  • Clinical Psychology 424
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 264
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 49
Replace Kathryn McPherson with:
Kathryn McPherson New Zealand
Elizabeth G. VanDenKerkhof Canada
Lesley D. Lutes United States
Robert L. Newton United States
Huda Huijer Abu‐Saad Netherlands
Jos W. R. Twisk Netherlands
H.‐H. König Germany
Eugenie Coakley United States
Linda McGowan United Kingdom
Erica I. Lubetkin United States
Mary Forhan relative to Kathryn McPherson New Zealand Kathryn McPherson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Kathryn McPherson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Forhan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Forhan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Forhan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Forhan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Forhan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Forhan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Forhan. The network helps show where Mary Forhan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary Forhan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary Forhan Line = papers co-authored together Mary Forhan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013282
2
Weight bias and health care utilization: a scoping review
Hit paper breakdown →
2019196
3 2015194
4 2013184
5 2013154
6 201799
7 201582
8 201881
9 201665
10 201359
11 201457
12 201756
13 200955
14 202049
15 201748
16 201646
17 201946
18 201045
19 201643
20 201938

About Mary Forhan

Mary Forhan is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Surgery and Occupational Therapy, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity and Health Practices (23 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (8 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (7 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (7 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (5 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (4 papers), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (4 papers) and Cardiac Health and Mental Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (637 citations), Occupational Therapy (138 citations), Clinical Psychology (424 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (264 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (49 citations). Mary Forhan has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Simone V. Gill, Carla M. Prado, Mary Law, Ximena Ramos Salas, Arya M. Sharma, Angela S. Alberga, Shelly Russell‐Mayhew, Valerie H. Taylor, Iyoma Y. Edache and Kristine Godziuk. Their work appears in journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation, Canadian Journal of Diabetes, Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research and Obesity Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact