Mary Ellen Wiltrout
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment 3
-
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 3
- Computer Science Applications top 10%
- Online Learning and Analytics 10
-
- Online and Blended Learning 3
- Student Assessment and Feedback 3
-
- Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning 2
-
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods 2
-
- Experimental Learning in Engineering 2
- Co-authors
- Graham C. WalkerL. WatersBrenda K. MinesingerSanjay D’SouzaGiora AlexandronJosé A. Ruipérez‐ValienteVirgil SimplăceanuNancy T. Ho
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpainIsrael
In The Last Decade
Mary Ellen Wiltrout
12 papers receiving 593 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Cancer Research 160
- Molecular Biology 505
- Computer Science Applications 38
- Cell Biology 66
- Oncology 78
Countries citing papers authored by Mary Ellen Wiltrout
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Ellen Wiltrout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Ellen Wiltrout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Ellen Wiltrout more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Ellen Wiltrout
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Ellen Wiltrout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Ellen Wiltrout. The network helps show where Mary Ellen Wiltrout may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Mary Ellen Wiltrout, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 42 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 465 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 17 |
About Mary Ellen Wiltrout
Mary Ellen Wiltrout is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Education, Media Technology, Cancer Research and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online Learning and Analytics (10 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (3 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (3 papers), Online and Blended Learning (3 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (3 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (2 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers) and Experimental Learning in Engineering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (160 citations), Molecular Biology (505 citations), Computer Science Applications (38 citations), Cell Biology (66 citations) and Oncology (78 citations). Mary Ellen Wiltrout has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Graham C. Walker, L. Waters, Brenda K. Minesinger, Sanjay D’Souza, Giora Alexandron, José A. Ruipérez‐Valiente, Virgil Simplăceanu, Nancy T. Ho, Chien Ho and Jonathan A. Lukin. Their work appears in journals such as Genetics, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, DNA repair, Biochemistry and Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.