Mary E. Cramer

554 total citations
34 papers, 424 citations indexed

About

Mary E. Cramer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary E. Cramer has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 424 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in General Health Professions, 6 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 6 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Mary E. Cramer's work include Community Health and Development (9 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers) and Agriculture and Farm Safety (6 papers). Mary E. Cramer is often cited by papers focused on Community Health and Development (9 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers) and Agriculture and Farm Safety (6 papers). Mary E. Cramer collaborates with scholars based in United States. Mary E. Cramer's co-authors include Jan R. Atwood, Julie A. Stoner, Amy Ford, Keith J. Mueller, Sangeeta Agrawal, Stephen Lazoritz, David Palm, Elizabeth R. Stevens, Katherine Jones and Melody Hertzog and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration and Western Journal of Nursing Research.

In The Last Decade

Mary E. Cramer

31 papers receiving 393 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mary E. Cramer United States	15	234	64	56	43	39	34	424
Benita Cohen Canada	11	246 1.1×	36 0.6×	34 0.6×	44 1.0×	50 1.3×	24	350
Diane R. Lancaster United States	8	144 0.6×	42 0.7×	77 1.4×	59 1.4×	25 0.6×	11	384
Coleen E. Toronto United States	10	192 0.8×	34 0.5×	87 1.6×	77 1.8×	17 0.4×	16	531
Ann Bergen United Kingdom	11	230 1.0×	23 0.4×	101 1.8×	57 1.3×	17 0.4×	15	399
Regina Rigatto Witt Brazil	12	300 1.3×	64 1.0×	64 1.1×	88 2.0×	14 0.4×	59	469
Sheryl Boblin Canada	10	110 0.5×	51 0.8×	31 0.6×	43 1.0×	22 0.6×	17	380
Ann H. Cary United States	9	156 0.7×	106 1.7×	58 1.0×	98 2.3×	28 0.7×	26	389
Lynne Williams United Kingdom	13	397 1.7×	34 0.5×	77 1.4×	64 1.5×	8 0.2×	41	604
A Mccutcheon Canada	7	292 1.2×	51 0.8×	57 1.0×	48 1.1×	21 0.5×	10	467
Michael R. Bleich United States	12	363 1.6×	94 1.5×	98 1.8×	95 2.2×	72 1.8×	72	643

Countries citing papers authored by Mary E. Cramer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary E. Cramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary E. Cramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary E. Cramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary E. Cramer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary E. Cramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary E. Cramer. The network helps show where Mary E. Cramer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary E. Cramer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary E. Cramer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary E. Cramer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary E. Cramer. Mary E. Cramer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Cramer, Mary E., Lani Zimmerman, Carol Geary, et al.. (2020). Participatory needs assessment and action planning for a clinical and translational research network. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(1). e69–e69. 3 indexed citations

Cramer, Mary E., Elizabeth Mollard, Amy Ford, Kevin Kupzyk, & Fernando A. Wilson. (2018). The feasibility and promise of mobile technology with community health worker reinforcement to reduce rural preterm birth. Public Health Nursing. 35(6). 508–516. 14 indexed citations

Cramer, Mary E., et al.. (2018). Are Advanced Providers Prepared to Care for the Agricultural Population?. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners. 15(2). e41–e44.

Ford, Amy, et al.. (2017). Identification of populations at risk: Stillbirth toolkit for health care providers. Applied Nursing Research. 39. 249–251.

Cramer, Mary E., et al.. (2017). Evaluating Effective Leadership and Governance in a Midwestern Agricultural Safety and Health Coalition. Workplace Health & Safety. 66(2). 84–94. 1 indexed citations

Cramer, Mary E., et al.. (2015). Children’s Agricultural Safety Network: Evaluating Organizational Effectiveness and Impacts. Journal of Agromedicine. 20(2). 105–115. 1 indexed citations

Cramer, Mary E., et al.. (2014). Retooling the RN workforce in long-term care: Nursing certification as a pathway to quality improvement. Geriatric Nursing. 35(3). 182–187. 26 indexed citations

Duysen, Ellen G., et al.. (2014). Social Marketing Campaign Promoting the Use of Respiratory Protection Devices Among Farmers. Journal of Agromedicine. 19(3). 316–324. 11 indexed citations

Cramer, Mary E., et al.. (2012). Conceptual models to guide best practices in organization and development of State Action Coalitions. Nursing Outlook. 61(2). 70–77. 2 indexed citations

10.

Cramer, Mary E., Katherine Jones, & Melody Hertzog. (2011). Nurse Staffing in Critical Access Hospitals. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 26(4). 335–343. 17 indexed citations

11.

Cramer, Mary E., et al.. (2009). A policy analysis of health care reform: implications for nurses.. PubMed. 27(5). 281–7.

12.

Cramer, Mary E., et al.. (2009). Partnering with rural communities to meet the demand for a qualified nursing workforce. Nursing Outlook. 57(3). 148–157. 14 indexed citations

13.

Cramer, Mary E., et al.. (2008). Telehealth: A policy analysis for quality, impact on patient outcomes, and political feasibility. Nursing Outlook. 56(4). 152–158. 14 indexed citations

14.

Cramer, Mary E., et al.. (2007). Evaluating the Social and Economic Impact of Community‐Based Prenatal Care. Public Health Nursing. 24(4). 329–336. 18 indexed citations

15.

Cramer, Mary E., et al.. (2007). Evaluating Community-based Programs for Eliminating Secondhand Smoke Using Evidence-based Research for Best Practices. Family & Community Health. 30(2). 129–143. 4 indexed citations

16.

Cramer, Mary E., et al.. (2007). A Policy Analysis of Federal Registered Nurses Safe Staffing Legislation. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 37(7/8). 350–356. 6 indexed citations

17.

Cramer, Mary E., Jan R. Atwood, & Julie A. Stoner. (2006). A Conceptual Model for Understanding Effective Coalitions Involved in Health Promotion Programing. Public Health Nursing. 23(1). 67–73. 33 indexed citations

18.

Cramer, Mary E., Jan R. Atwood, & Julie A. Stoner. (2006). Measuring Community Coalition Effectiveness Using the ICE^© Instrument. Public Health Nursing. 23(1). 74–87. 29 indexed citations

19.

Cramer, Mary E., et al.. (2005). The Phenomenon of Caring. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development. 21(4). 160–170. 10 indexed citations

20.

Cramer, Mary E., et al.. (2003). Evaluation Informs Coalition Programming for Environmental Tobacco Smoke Reduction. Journal of Community Health Nursing. 20(4). 245–258. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact