Mary Dodge

42 papers receiving 859 citations

Peers

Mary Dodge
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Gender Studies 233
  • Health 163
  • Sociology and Political Science 530
  • Clinical Psychology 190
  • Political Science and International Relations 212
Replace Tara O’Connor Shelley with:
Tara O’Connor Shelley United States
Kirby Goidel United States
Rebecca Wickes Australia
Clare Cannon United States
Meg A. Bond United States
Ariana Need Netherlands
Jennifer Holdaway United States
Rogelio Sáenz United States
Robert D. Baller United States
Barry Edmonston Canada
Mary Dodge relative to Tara O’Connor Shelley United States Tara O’Connor Shelley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Tara O’Connor Shelley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Dodge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Dodge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Dodge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Dodge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Dodge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Dodge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Dodge. The network helps show where Mary Dodge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Mary Dodge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary Dodge Line = papers co-authored together Mary Dodge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001163
2 2000112
3 201174
4 199563
5 201257
6 200244
7 201142
8 201040
9 200139
10 200038
11 200134
12 199132
13 200131
14 201326
15 200523
16
Visual communication in urban planning and urban design
199818
17 201917
18
GIS and urban design
199816
19 201311
20 200211

About Mary Dodge

Mary Dodge is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Gender Studies, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Health, having authored 43 papers that have together received 966 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (13 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (10 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (8 papers), Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (6 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (5 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (4 papers), Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (3 papers) and Gun Ownership and Violence Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (233 citations), Health (163 citations), Sociology and Political Science (530 citations), Clinical Psychology (190 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (212 citations). Mary Dodge has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Mark R. Pogrebin, Edith Greene, Angela R. Gover, Callie Marie Rennison, Lori L. Taylor, David Klinger, Andrew Hudson‐Smith, Thomas Williams, Philip M Stinson and Michael Batty. Their work appears in journals such as Women & Criminal Justice, Policing An International Journal, Crime Law and Social Change, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice and Journal of Criminal Justice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact