Mary Cregg
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- J. Margaret WoodhouseValerie H. PakemanWilliam FraserKathryn J. SaundersMargaret G. ParkerMargaret M. ParkerNathan BromhamDaniel P. Sanders
- Topics
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers)Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers)Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers)
- Journals
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual ScienceOptometry and Vision ScienceOphthalmic and Physiological Optics
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited Arab EmiratesFrance
In The Last Decade
Mary Cregg
7 papers receiving 362 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Epidemiology 258
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 181
- Ophthalmology 134
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 91
- Cognitive Neuroscience 73
Countries citing papers authored by Mary Cregg
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Cregg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Cregg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Cregg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Cregg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Cregg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Cregg. The network helps show where Mary Cregg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Cregg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Cregg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Cregg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Cregg. Mary Cregg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37 | |
| 2 | 39 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 88 | |
| 5 | Accommodation and refractive error in children with Down syndrome: cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. | 83 |
| 6 | The effect of age, size of target, and cognitive factors on accommodative responses of children with Down syndrome. | 33 |
| 7 | 84 |
About Mary Cregg
Mary Cregg is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Epidemiology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (134 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (181 citations) and Epidemiology (258 citations). Mary Cregg has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United Arab Emirates and France. Frequent co-authors include J. Margaret Woodhouse, Valerie H. Pakeman, William Fraser, Kathryn J. Saunders, Margaret G. Parker, Margaret M. Parker, Nathan Bromham, Daniel P. Sanders and Paul S. Adler. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Optometry and Vision Science and Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.