Mary C. Fraser
- Oncology top 2%
- Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management 25
- CAR-T cell therapy research 3
- Dermatology top 1%
- Skin Protection and Aging 3
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 9
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Skin and Cellular Biology Research 3
-
- Melanoma and MAPK Pathways 3
- RNA regulation and disease 2
-
- Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Margaret A. TuckerAlisa M. GoldsteinWallace H. ClarkNicholas C. DracopoliMark H. GreeneDavid E. ElderKenneth H. KraemerLaura Fontaine
- Cited by
- OncologyDermatologyCancer Research
- Journals
- New England Journal of Medicine (3 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaGermany
In The Last Decade
Mary C. Fraser
33 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Oncology 1.5k
- Dermatology 384
- Cancer Research 617
- Cell Biology 276
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 228
Countries citing papers authored by Mary C. Fraser
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary C. Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary C. Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary C. Fraser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary C. Fraser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary C. Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary C. Fraser. The network helps show where Mary C. Fraser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary C. Fraser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 27 | |
| 5 | Genetic testing for inherited predisposition to melanoma: has the time come? | 2004 | 3 |
| 6 | A Natural History of Melanomas and Dysplastic Nevi: An Atlas of Lesions in Melanoma-Prone Families | 2003 | 6 |
| 7 | 2002 | 86 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 29 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 12 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 473 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 33 | |
| 15 | 1994 | 30 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 90 | |
| 17 | 1992 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1989 | 13 | |
| 20 | 1989 | 228 |
About Mary C. Fraser
Mary C. Fraser is a scholar working on Oncology, Dermatology and Cancer Research, having authored 33 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (25 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (9 papers), Skin and Cellular Biology Research (3 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (3 papers), Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (3 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (3 papers), Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (3 papers) and RNA regulation and disease (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.5k citations), Dermatology (384 citations) and Cancer Research (617 citations). Mary C. Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Margaret A. Tucker, Alisa M. Goldstein, Wallace H. Clark, Nicholas C. Dracopoli, Mark H. Greene, David E. Elder, Kenneth H. Kraemer, Laura Fontaine, DuPont Guerry and Jeffery P. Struewing. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.