DuPont Guerry
- Oncology top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Dermatology top 0.2%
- Ophthalmology top 0.5%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Co-authors
- David E. ElderWallace H. ClarkMark H. GreenePhyllis A. GimottyAllan C. HalpernHarold A. MuellerMartin N. EpsteinWilliam T. Ham
- Topics
- Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (53 papers)Skin Protection and Aging (13 papers)Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (12 papers)
- Cited by
- DermatologyOncologyOphthalmology
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineJournal of Clinical InvestigationJournal of Clinical Oncology
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
DuPont Guerry
130 papers receiving 5.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
- Oncology 3.4k
- Molecular Biology 2.0k
- Dermatology 1.2k
- Ophthalmology 1.1k
- Epidemiology 916
Countries citing papers authored by DuPont Guerry
This map shows the geographic impact of DuPont Guerry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by DuPont Guerry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites DuPont Guerry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by DuPont Guerry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by DuPont Guerry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by DuPont Guerry. The network helps show where DuPont Guerry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of DuPont Guerry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of DuPont Guerry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of DuPont Guerry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with DuPont Guerry. DuPont Guerry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | 47 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 167 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 53 | |
| 11 | 143 | |
| 12 | 95 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 90 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 153 | |
| 19 | 49 | |
| 20 | Traumatic Hyphema: A Review of Experience at the Medical College of Virginia During the Past Decade | 5 |
About DuPont Guerry
DuPont Guerry is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Oncology and Dermatology, having authored 140 papers that have together received 6.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (53 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (13 papers) and Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (1.2k citations), Oncology (3.4k citations) and Ophthalmology (1.1k citations). DuPont Guerry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David E. Elder, Wallace H. Clark, Mark H. Greene, Phyllis A. Gimotty, Allan C. Halpern, Harold A. Mueller, Martin N. Epstein, William T. Ham, John J. Ruffolo and Walter J. Geeraets. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Clinical Investigation and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.