Mary Anne Schofield
- Molecular Biology
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- History top 5%
- Genetics
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey H MillerJanice Farrar ThaddeusMark L. MichaelsSylvia Harcstark MyersPatricia Meyer SpacksOscar Osburn WintherMitzi MyersPeggy Kamuf
- Topics
- Literature: history, themes, analysis (5 papers)Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (3 papers)Canadian Identity and History (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mary Anne Schofield
13 papers receiving 167 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Molecular Biology 112
- Literature and Literary Theory 63
- History 41
- Genetics 40
- Sociology and Political Science 32
Countries citing papers authored by Mary Anne Schofield
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Anne Schofield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Anne Schofield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Anne Schofield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Anne Schofield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Anne Schofield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Anne Schofield. The network helps show where Mary Anne Schofield may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Anne Schofield
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Anne Schofield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Anne Schofield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Anne Schofield. Mary Anne Schofield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | 53 | |
| 8 | 42 | |
| 9 | 38 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 59 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | Quiet rebellion : the fictional heroines of Eliza Fowler Haywood | 1 |
| 18 | At the Red Summit : interpreter behind the Iron Curtain | 3 |
| 19 | Diary of a dying Empire | 5 |
About Mary Anne Schofield
Mary Anne Schofield is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Music, having authored 19 papers that have together received 255 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature: history, themes, analysis (5 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (3 papers) and Canadian Identity and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (63 citations), History (41 citations) and Religious studies (17 citations). Mary Anne Schofield has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey H Miller, Janice Farrar Thaddeus, Mark L. Michaels, Sylvia Harcstark Myers, Patricia Meyer Spacks, Oscar Osburn Winther, Mitzi Myers, Peggy Kamuf, Katharine M. Rogers and Ruth Perry. Their work appears in journals such as Genetics, Journal of Bacteriology and Journal of American History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.