Marty Lail
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 2%
- Mechanical Engineering top 5%
- Materials Chemistry
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- T. Brent GunnoeMustapha SoukriThomas R. CundariJeffrey L. PetersenIgnacio LuzJak TanthanaLuke ColemanN.A. Foley
- Topics
- Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (17 papers)Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (13 papers)Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (11 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyAngewandte Chemie International EditionNature Communications
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomBelgium
In The Last Decade
Marty Lail
41 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Organic Chemistry 625
- Inorganic Chemistry 542
- Mechanical Engineering 386
- Materials Chemistry 271
- Biomedical Engineering 219
Countries citing papers authored by Marty Lail
This map shows the geographic impact of Marty Lail's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marty Lail with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marty Lail more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marty Lail
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marty Lail. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marty Lail. The network helps show where Marty Lail may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marty Lail
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marty Lail. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marty Lail based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marty Lail. Marty Lail is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 71 | |
| 7 | Pilot Testing of a Non-Aqueous Solvent (NAS) CO2 Capture Process | 2 |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 57 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 86 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 92 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About Marty Lail
Marty Lail is a scholar working on Catalysis, Process Chemistry and Technology and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (17 papers), Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (13 papers) and Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (159 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (542 citations) and Catalysis (152 citations). Marty Lail has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include T. Brent Gunnoe, Mustapha Soukri, Thomas R. Cundari, Jeffrey L. Petersen, Ignacio Luz, Jak Tanthana, Luke Coleman, N.A. Foley, Khaldoon A. Barakat and Yuee Feng. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Angewandte Chemie International Edition and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.