Martin Zebracki
- Urban Studies top 1%
- Public Spaces through Art 20
- Cultural Industries and Urban Development 16
- Urban Planning and Governance 5
-
- Art, Politics, and Modernism 12
-
- Geographies of human-animal interactions 6
- Conservation top 5%
- Museology top 10%
-
- Participatory Visual Research Methods 6
- African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues 5
- Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics 4
- Co-authors
- Irina van AalstYvonne BarnardKaren LucasTommaso M. MilaniBrian DoucetAdriaan van KlinkenRobert M. VanderbeckAnn Louise Sumner
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsBelgium
In The Last Decade
Martin Zebracki
38 papers receiving 361 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Urban Studies 191
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 62
- Geography, Planning and Development 50
- Conservation 27
- Museology 15
Countries citing papers authored by Martin Zebracki
This map shows the geographic impact of Martin Zebracki's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martin Zebracki with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martin Zebracki more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Martin Zebracki
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martin Zebracki. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martin Zebracki. The network helps show where Martin Zebracki may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Martin Zebracki, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 18 | Public Artopia: Art in Public Space in Question | 2012 | 9 |
| 19 | 2011 | 33 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 13 |
About Martin Zebracki
Martin Zebracki is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 44 papers that have together received 396 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Spaces through Art (20 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (16 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (12 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (6 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (6 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (5 papers), African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues (5 papers) and Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (191 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (62 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (50 citations). Martin Zebracki has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Irina van Aalst, Yvonne Barnard, Karen Lucas, Tommaso M. Milani, Brian Doucet, Adriaan van Klinken, Robert M. Vanderbeck, Ann Louise Sumner, C. Scott Watson and Andrea Caragliu. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Geoscience, Urban Studies and Progress in Human Geography.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.