Martin Williams
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Clive G. LongClive R. HollinDaniel RoggerJane DyasSusan NancarrowJo CookeImran RasulAnthony M. Bertelli
- Topics
- Public Policy and Administration Research (7 papers)Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers)Corruption and Economic Development (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Martin Williams
23 papers receiving 559 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Sociology and Political Science 141
- Political Science and International Relations 133
- General Health Professions 133
- Economics and Econometrics 114
- Epidemiology 91
Countries citing papers authored by Martin Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Martin Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martin Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martin Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Martin Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martin Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martin Williams. The network helps show where Martin Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Martin Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Martin Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Martin Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Martin Williams. Martin Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 66 | |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 34 | |
| 9 | 85 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 64 | |
| 12 | The Social and Economic Impacts of South Africa's Child Support Grant | 30 |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | General Certificate of Secondary Education | 16 |
About Martin Williams
Martin Williams is a scholar working on Public Administration, Safety Research and Development, having authored 24 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Policy and Administration Research (7 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers) and Corruption and Economic Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (69 citations), Development (29 citations) and Safety Research (56 citations). Martin Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Clive G. Long, Clive R. Hollin, Daniel Rogger, Jane Dyas, Susan Nancarrow, Jo Cooke, Imran Rasul, Anthony M. Bertelli, Mai Hassan and Dan Honig. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, World Development and Addiction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.