Martin Stonehouse
About
In The Last Decade
Martin Stonehouse
10 papers receiving 345 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Molecular Biology 286
- Genetics 84
- Molecular Medicine 55
- Physiology 48
- Endocrinology 47
Countries citing papers authored by Martin Stonehouse
This map shows the geographic impact of Martin Stonehouse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martin Stonehouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martin Stonehouse more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Martin Stonehouse
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martin Stonehouse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martin Stonehouse. The network helps show where Martin Stonehouse may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Martin Stonehouse
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Martin Stonehouse. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Martin Stonehouse based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Martin Stonehouse. Martin Stonehouse is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 22 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 43 | |
| 6 | 49 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 43 | |
| 9 | 79 | |
| 10 | 82 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.