Marlene G. Fine
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Communication top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Topics
- Gender Diversity and Inequality (5 papers)Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers)Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of CommunicationJournal of Language and Social PsychologyQuarterly Journal of Speech
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Marlene G. Fine
17 papers receiving 260 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Gender Studies 139
- Communication 95
- Sociology and Political Science 76
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 55
- Literature and Literary Theory 45
Countries citing papers authored by Marlene G. Fine
This map shows the geographic impact of Marlene G. Fine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marlene G. Fine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marlene G. Fine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marlene G. Fine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marlene G. Fine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marlene G. Fine. The network helps show where Marlene G. Fine may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marlene G. Fine
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marlene G. Fine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marlene G. Fine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marlene G. Fine. Marlene G. Fine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Role of the Press in Framing the Bilingual Education Debate: Ten Years after Sheltered Immersion in Massachusetts | 3 |
| 2 | 43 | |
| 3 | 40 | |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | Multicultural Voices in the Workplace: Organizational Communication in the Year 2000. | 1 |
| 8 | 56 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | Dialect Features in the Language of Black Characters on American Television Programming. | 2 |
About Marlene G. Fine
Marlene G. Fine is a scholar working on Communication, Gender Studies and Linguistics and Language, having authored 17 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (5 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers) and Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (139 citations), Communication (95 citations) and Public Administration (30 citations). Marlene G. Fine has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Fern L. Johnson, Leslie K. Davis, Carolyn Anderson and Karen A.Foss. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Communication, Journal of Language and Social Psychology and Quarterly Journal of Speech.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.