Markus Noeth
About
In The Last Decade
Markus Noeth
4 papers receiving 107 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
- Accounting 94
- Economics and Econometrics 69
- Finance 60
- General Decision Sciences 18
- Demography 13
Countries citing papers authored by Markus Noeth
This map shows the geographic impact of Markus Noeth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markus Noeth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markus Noeth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Markus Noeth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markus Noeth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markus Noeth. The network helps show where Markus Noeth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Markus Noeth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Markus Noeth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Markus Noeth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Markus Noeth. Markus Noeth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 109 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Information Aggregation with Random Ordering: Cascades and Overconfidence | 9 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.