This map shows the geographic impact of Markus Lier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markus Lier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markus Lier more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markus Lier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markus Lier. The network helps show where Markus Lier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Markus Lier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Markus Lier.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Markus Lier based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Markus Lier. Markus Lier is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Widmark, Camilla, Henrik Heräjärvi, Pia Katila, et al.. (2020). The Forest in Northern Europe’s Emerging Bioeconomy Reflections on the forest’s role in the bioeconomy. Jukuri (Luonnonvarakeskus Tietopalvelu).1 indexed citations
Lier, Markus, et al.. (2019). Understanding the regional bioeconomy settings and competencies in 29 EU regions in 11 EU countries. Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)).4 indexed citations
7.
Lier, Markus, et al.. (2019). Suomen metsät 2019 : Kestävän metsänhoidon kriteereihin ja indikaattoreihin perustuen. Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)).1 indexed citations
8.
Lier, Markus, et al.. (2019). Finland’s forests 2019 : Based on FOREST EUROPE Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Forest Management. Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)).2 indexed citations
9.
Lier, Markus, et al.. (2018). Synthesis on bioeconomy monitoring systems in the EU Member States - indicators for monitoring the progress of bioeconomy. Jukuri (Luonnonvarakeskus Tietopalvelu).20 indexed citations
10.
Soini, Katriina, et al.. (2018). Strategic Knowledge and Innovation Agenda. Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)).1 indexed citations
11.
Lier, Markus & Jari Parviainen. (2015). Integration of Nature Protection in Forest Policy in Finland. INTEGRATE Country Report. EFICENT-OEF, Freiburg.. Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)).1 indexed citations
12.
Gasparini, Patrizia, Göran Ståhl, Jari Parviainen, et al.. (2015). Maintenance and appropriate enhancement of forest resources and their contribution to global carbon cycles. Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)).5 indexed citations
13.
Bozzano, Michèle, Christine Estreguil, Jarkko Koskela, et al.. (2015). Maintenance, conservation and appropriate enhancement of biological diversity in forest ecosystems. Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)).8 indexed citations
Lier, Markus, et al.. (2013). European initiatives on criteria and indicators for forest biodiversity.. Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)).1 indexed citations
16.
Lier, Markus, et al.. (2013). Implementing Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management in Europe. European Forest Institute. 2013.. Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)).11 indexed citations
17.
Lier, Markus, et al.. (2007). The clearinghouse mechanism. Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)). 135–147.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.