Markus Kiderlen

43 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers

Markus Kiderlen
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Applied Mathematics 197
  • Computational Mathematics 6
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 34
  • Geometry and Topology 73
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 79
Replace Jan Rataj with:
Jan Rataj Czechia
Joseph H. G. Fu United States
Martins Bruveris Austria
Gengzhe Chang China
Pierre Calka France
Endre Makai Hungary
Jean-Paul Calvi France
Kazım İlarslan Türkiye
Yuri Nikolayevsky Australia
V. A. Zalgaller Russia
Markus Kiderlen relative to Jan Rataj Czechia Jan Rataj's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jan Rataj · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Markus Kiderlen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Markus Kiderlen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markus Kiderlen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markus Kiderlen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Markus Kiderlen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markus Kiderlen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markus Kiderlen. The network helps show where Markus Kiderlen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Markus Kiderlen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Markus Kiderlen Line = papers co-authored together Markus Kiderlen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200632
2 199819
3 200616
4 200913
5 200812
6 201712
7 200512
8 200711
9 200611
10 200111
11 200310
12 199910
13 20089
14 20048
15 20148
16 20166
17 20176
18 20145
19 20155
20 20115

About Markus Kiderlen

Markus Kiderlen is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Geometry and Topology, Statistics and Probability and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 48 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Point processes and geometric inequalities (35 papers), Digital Image Processing Techniques (16 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (9 papers), Morphological variations and asymmetry (6 papers), Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (5 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (4 papers) and Topological and Geometric Data Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (197 citations), Computational Mathematics (6 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (34 citations), Geometry and Topology (73 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (79 citations). Markus Kiderlen has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eva B. Vedel Jensen, Richard J. Gardner, Wolfgang Weil, Paul Goodey, Jan Rataj, Johanna F. Ziegel, Andreas Pfrang, Karl‐Anton Dorph‐Petersen, Daniel Hug and Ute Hahn. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in Applied Probability, Journal of Microscopy, Advances in Applied Mathematics, Image Analysis & Stereology and Discrete & Computational Geometry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact