Replace Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing with:
Multidimensional Systems and Signal ProcessingChina
DataUnited States
International Journal of Biomedical ImagingUnited States
Evolutionary IntelligenceIndia
Journal of Applied BiomedicineIndia
IEEE Transactions on Computational ImagingChina
EURASIP Journal on Image and Video ProcessingChina
Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in MedicineAustralia
IEE Proceedings - Vision Image and Signal ProcessingUnited Kingdom
Biomedical Engineering LettersSouth Korea
Multidimensional Systems and Signal ProcessingChinaView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Image Analysis & Stereology
Image Analysis & Stereology · 1×
×2.54.7kCVPR
×0.3432RNMI
×0.177OPHTH
×2.61.6kMT
×0.6353ME
Citations per year, relative to Image Analysis & Stereology
Image Analysis & Stereology · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Image Analysis & Stereology
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Image Analysis & Stereology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Image Analysis & Stereology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Image Analysis & Stereology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Image Analysis & Stereology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Image Analysis & Stereology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Image Analysis & Stereology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.