Markus Hummel

39 papers receiving 288 citations

Peers

Markus Hummel
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 57
  • Information Systems 140
  • Management Information Systems 54
  • Computer Science Applications 25
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 31
Replace Adeola Olusola Ajayi-Nifise with:
Adeola Olusola Ajayi-Nifise United States
Ramakrishnan Ramakrishnan India
Schultze United States
Funmilola Olatundun Olatoye United States
Siou Chew Kuek
Egil Øvrelid Norway
Axel Hund Germany
Simon Kaggwa United States
Precha Thavikulwat United States
André Luiz Zambalde Brazil
Markus Hummel relative to Adeola Olusola Ajayi-Nifise United States Adeola Olusola Ajayi-Nifise's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Adeola Olusola Ajayi-Nifise · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Markus Hummel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Markus Hummel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markus Hummel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markus Hummel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Markus Hummel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markus Hummel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markus Hummel. The network helps show where Markus Hummel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Markus Hummel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Markus Hummel Line = papers co-authored together Markus Hummel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201369
2 200440
3 201434
4 201533
5
Industrie 4.0 und die Folgen für Arbeitsmarkt und Wirtschaft: Szenario-Rechnungen im Rahmen der BIBB-IAB-Qualifikations- und Berufsfeldprojektionen
201513
6
Vertrauter Befund: Höhere Bildung schützt auch in der Krise vor Arbeitslosigkeit
200511
7 201510
8
THE ROLE OF SHARED UNDERSTANDING IN DISTRIBUTED SCRUM DEVELOPMENT: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS
20169
9 20159
10
Schwierige Fortschreibung: Der Trend bleibt - Geringqualifizierte sind häufiger arbeitslos
20078
11
Wirtschaft 4.0 und die Folgen für Arbeitsmarkt und Ökonomie: Szenario-Rechnungen im Rahmen der BIBB-IAB-Qualifikations- und Berufsfeldprojektionen
20166
12
Prognose 2010/2011: Der Arbeitsmarkt schließt an den vorherigen Aufschwung an
20106
13
Engpässe auf dem Arbeitsmarkt: Geändertes Bildungs- und Erwerbsverhalten mildert Fachkräftemangel
20126
14
Industry 4.0 and the consequences for labour market and economy : scenario calculations in line with the BIBB-IAB qualifications and occupational field projections (Industrie 4.0 und die Folgen für Arbeitsmarkt und Wirtschaft : Szenario-Rechnungen im Rahmen der BIBB-IAB-Qualifikations- und Berufsfeldprojektionen)
20155
15 20175
16
Qualifikations- und Berufsfeldprojektionen bis 2030: Engpässe und Überhänge regional ungleich verteilt
20155
17
Bildungspolitik: Steuert Deutschland langfristig auf einen Fachkräftemangel hin?
20035
18 20134
19
Zur langfristigen Entwicklung des qualifikationsspezifischen Arbeitskräfteangebots und -bedarfs in Deutschland: empirische Befunde und aktuelle Projektionsergebnisse (On the long-term development of qualification-specific labour supply and labour demand in Germany: empirical findings and current projection results)
20054
20
Qualifikationsspezifische Arbeitslosigkeit im Jahr 2005 und die Einführung der Hartz-IV-Reform: empirische Befunde und methodische Probleme
20074

About Markus Hummel

Markus Hummel is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Information Systems and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 41 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (23 papers), Social Policies and Healthcare Reform (13 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (10 papers), Innovation, Technology, and Society (9 papers), European Socioeconomic and Political Studies (9 papers), German Economic Analysis & Policies (8 papers), Software Engineering Research (7 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (57 citations), Information Systems (140 citations), Management Information Systems (54 citations), Computer Science Applications (25 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (31 citations). Markus Hummel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Roland Holten, Christoph Rosenkranz, Gerd Zika, K. Doll, Michela Re, A. Belloli, D. Pravettoni, Tobias Maier, Marc Ingo Wolter and Enzo Weber. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Business & Information Systems Engineering, American Journal of Veterinary Research, Project Management Journal and Communications of the Association for Information Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact