Gerd Zika

506 total citations
44 papers, 198 citations indexed

About

Gerd Zika is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Gerd Zika has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 198 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in General Health Professions, 23 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 18 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Gerd Zika's work include Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (23 papers), German Economic Analysis & Policies (16 papers) and Innovation, Technology, and Society (16 papers). Gerd Zika is often cited by papers focused on Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (23 papers), German Economic Analysis & Policies (16 papers) and Innovation, Technology, and Society (16 papers). Gerd Zika collaborates with scholars based in Germany and Bulgaria. Gerd Zika's co-authors include Tobias Maier, Enzo Weber, Johann Fuchs, Markus Hummel, Marc Ingo Wolter, Bernd Meyer, Christian Lutz, Sabine Klinger, Carsten von Hänisch and Thomas Drosdowski and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Applied Economics and Economic Systems Research.

In The Last Decade

Gerd Zika

34 papers receiving 149 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gerd Zika Germany 7 101 61 48 26 23 44 198
Carlos Góes United States 8 127 1.3× 42 0.7× 12 0.3× 14 0.5× 14 0.6× 28 201
Ilya Manuylov Denmark 4 201 2.0× 63 1.0× 35 0.7× 6 0.2× 12 0.5× 5 253
Florian Lehmer Germany 9 148 1.5× 115 1.9× 51 1.1× 51 2.0× 6 0.3× 24 244
Mariya Brussevich United States 9 119 1.2× 75 1.2× 49 1.0× 15 0.6× 3 0.1× 19 219
Leonid Grigoryev Russia 10 132 1.3× 41 0.7× 14 0.3× 33 1.3× 52 2.3× 55 252
Anja Rossen Germany 6 170 1.7× 98 1.6× 13 0.3× 20 0.8× 18 0.8× 13 270
Ioannis Kaplanis United Kingdom 7 149 1.5× 43 0.7× 21 0.4× 38 1.5× 10 0.4× 12 213
Wiljan van den Berge Netherlands 6 142 1.4× 71 1.2× 59 1.2× 8 0.3× 3 0.1× 10 208
Catherine Saget United States 9 144 1.4× 54 0.9× 71 1.5× 56 2.2× 5 0.2× 24 259
Miriam Rehm Austria 8 99 1.0× 73 1.2× 30 0.6× 20 0.8× 11 0.5× 25 179

Countries citing papers authored by Gerd Zika

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gerd Zika's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerd Zika with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerd Zika more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gerd Zika

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerd Zika. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerd Zika. The network helps show where Gerd Zika may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gerd Zika

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gerd Zika. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gerd Zika based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gerd Zika. Gerd Zika is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Weber, Enzo, et al.. (2020). Elektromobilität 2035 - ein regionaler Blick: Effekte auf Wirtschaft und Erwerbstätigkeit durch die Elektrifizierung des Antriebsstrangs von Personenkraftwagen aus regionaler Perspektive. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1 indexed citations
2.
Zika, Gerd, et al.. (2020). Aktualisierte BMAS-Prognose "Digitalisierte Arbeitswelt". Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences).
3.
Kruppe, Thomas, Ute Leber, Britta Matthes, et al.. (2019). Digitalisierung: Herausforderungen für die Aus- und Weiterbildung in Deutschland. Econstor (Econstor).
4.
Bauer, Anja, Johann Fuchs, Markus Hummel, et al.. (2019). IAB-Prognose 2019/2020: Konjunktureller Gegenwind für den Arbeitsmarkt. Econstor (Econstor). 1 indexed citations
5.
Fuchs, Johann, et al.. (2016). IAB-Prognose 2016: Beschäftigung und Arbeitskräfteangebot so hoch wie nie. Econstor (Econstor). 1 indexed citations
6.
Wolter, Marc Ingo, et al.. (2015). Industry 4.0 and the consequences for labour market and economy : scenario calculations in line with the BIBB-IAB qualifications and occupational field projections (Industrie 4.0 und die Folgen für Arbeitsmarkt und Wirtschaft : Szenario-Rechnungen im Rahmen der BIBB-IAB-Qualifikations- und Berufsfeldprojektionen). RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 5 indexed citations
7.
Wolter, Marc Ingo, et al.. (2015). Industrie 4.0 und die Folgen für Arbeitsmarkt und Wirtschaft: Szenario-Rechnungen im Rahmen der BIBB-IAB-Qualifikations- und Berufsfeldprojektionen. Econstor (Econstor). 13 indexed citations
8.
Fuchs, Johann, et al.. (2014). Arbeitsmarkt 2014/2015: Robust, aber risikobehaftet. Econstor (Econstor). 3 indexed citations
9.
Maier, Tobias, et al.. (2013). Future Skilled-Labour Markets in Germany: from Model-Based Calculations to Scenarios. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
10.
Zika, Gerd, Marc Ingo Wolter, Markus Hummel, et al.. (2012). In der Arbeitszeit steckt noch eine Menge Potenzial. Qualifikations- und Berufsfeldprojektionen bis 2030. 2 indexed citations
11.
Zika, Gerd, et al.. (2012). Kapitel D: Fachkräftebedarf. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 1 indexed citations
12.
Maier, Tobias, Gerd Zika, Markus Hummel, et al.. (2012). Alternative Szenarien der Entwicklung von Qualifikation und Arbeit bis 2030. 2 indexed citations
13.
Fuchs, Johann, et al.. (2011). Neue Arbeitsmarktprognose 2011: Rekorde und Risiken. Econstor (Econstor). 4 indexed citations
14.
Fuchs, Johann, et al.. (2010). Entwicklung des Arbeitsmarktes 2010: Die Spuren der Krise sind noch länger sichtbar. Econstor (Econstor). 3 indexed citations
15.
Meyer, Bernd, et al.. (2007). National Economic Policy Simulations with Global Interdependencies: A Sensitivity Analysis for Germany. Economic Systems Research. 19(1). 37–55. 25 indexed citations
16.
Lutz, Christian, et al.. (2005). Projektion des Arbeitskräftebedarfs bis 2015: Modellrechnungen auf Basis des IAB/INFORGE-Modells (Projection of the demand for labour up to 2015: model calculations on the basis of the IAB/INFORGE model). Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung. 35(3). 305–326. 2 indexed citations
17.
Fuchs, Johann, et al.. (2005). Arbeitsmarktbilanz bis 2020: Besserung langfristig möglich. Econstor (Econstor). 3 indexed citations
18.
Walwei, Ulrich, et al.. (2004). Sozialabgaben und Beschäftigung (Social security contributions and employment). Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung. 36(4). 672–688.
19.
Zika, Gerd, et al.. (2003). Volkswirtschaftliche Effekte einer Arbeitszeitverkürzung : eine Simulationsstudie für Westdeutschland mit dem makroökonometrischen Modell SYSIFO (Economic effects of a reduction in working hours : a simulation study for western Germany with the macro-economic model SYSIFO). Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung. 29(2). 179–202.
20.
Koch, Susanne, et al.. (2003). Ein Freibetrag bei den Sozialabgaben könnte mehr Beschäftigung schaffen: was wäre wenn?. Econstor (Econstor). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026