Mark Yates

1.1k total citations
36 papers, 734 citations indexed

About

Mark Yates is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Yates has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 734 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 21 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 10 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Mark Yates's work include Reading and Literacy Development (21 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (14 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers). Mark Yates is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (21 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (14 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers). Mark Yates collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Mark Yates's co-authors include Greg B. Simpson, Lawrence Locker, Michael E. R. Nicholls, Timothy J. Slattery, Tobias Loetscher, Danielle M. Ploetz, Catherine Orr, John Friend, Andrea M. Loftus and Catherine A. Schevon and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Nature Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Mark Yates

36 papers receiving 706 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Yates United States 17 537 362 204 105 78 36 734
J. A. Junge United States 9 607 1.1× 326 0.9× 197 1.0× 75 0.7× 155 2.0× 13 901
Christian Forkstam Netherlands 15 739 1.4× 415 1.1× 138 0.7× 92 0.9× 72 0.9× 22 967
Anna Maria Di Betta United Kingdom 10 551 1.0× 381 1.1× 143 0.7× 41 0.4× 63 0.8× 13 702
Adam Chuderski Poland 15 484 0.9× 198 0.5× 485 2.4× 152 1.4× 57 0.7× 59 821
Qing Cai China 15 1.0k 1.9× 284 0.8× 207 1.0× 39 0.4× 49 0.6× 42 1.2k
Katharine Graf Estes United States 17 562 1.0× 1.3k 3.5× 385 1.9× 175 1.7× 44 0.6× 31 1.4k
Louisa Bogaerts Belgium 17 551 1.0× 591 1.6× 130 0.6× 116 1.1× 158 2.0× 38 963
James Bartolotti United States 15 657 1.2× 651 1.8× 358 1.8× 99 0.9× 19 0.2× 30 978
Cara H. Cashon United States 12 415 0.8× 290 0.8× 271 1.3× 37 0.4× 52 0.7× 23 648
Mike Page United Kingdom 17 943 1.8× 681 1.9× 241 1.2× 187 1.8× 125 1.6× 27 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Yates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Yates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Yates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Yates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Yates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Yates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Yates. The network helps show where Mark Yates may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Yates

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Yates. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Yates based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Yates. Mark Yates is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Herman, Alexander, Elliot H. Smith, Catherine A. Schevon, et al.. (2023). Pretrial predictors of conflict response efficacy in the human prefrontal cortex. iScience. 26(11). 108047–108047. 2 indexed citations
2.
Myers, John, Elliot H. Smith, Marcin Leszczyński, et al.. (2022). The Spatial Reach of Neuronal Coherence and Spike-Field Coupling across the Human Neocortex. Journal of Neuroscience. 42(32). 6285–6294. 8 indexed citations
3.
Yates, Mark, et al.. (2020). Measuring the influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word recognition with the N400: Evidence for semantic scaffolding. Brain and Language. 211. 104866–104866. 3 indexed citations
4.
Vasilev, Martin R., Mark Yates, & Timothy J. Slattery. (2019). Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished Literature. Journal of Cognition. 2(1). 43–43. 13 indexed citations
5.
Yates, Mark, et al.. (2018). Non-symbolic magnitudes are represented spatially: Evidence from a non-symbolic SNARC task. PLoS ONE. 13(8). e0203019–e0203019. 26 indexed citations
6.
Cortese, Michael J., et al.. (2018). Examining word processing via a megastudy of conditional reading aloud. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 71(11). 2295–2313. 17 indexed citations
7.
Schevon, Catherine A., Shraddha Srinivasan, Garrett P. Banks, et al.. (2017). Neuronal activity in human anterior cingulate cortex modulates with internal cognitive state during multi-source interference task. PubMed. 2017. 962–965. 1 indexed citations
8.
Slattery, Timothy J., Mark Yates, & Bernhard Angele. (2016). Interword and interletter spacing effects during reading revisited: Interactions with word and font characteristics.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 22(4). 406–422. 18 indexed citations
9.
Loetscher, Tobias, et al.. (2012). The highs and lows of the interaction between word meaning and space.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 39(4). 964–973. 35 indexed citations
10.
Yates, Mark. (2011). The Carnegie Effect: Elevating Practical Training Over Liberal Education in Curricular Reform. SSRN Electronic Journal. 17. 233–254. 1 indexed citations
11.
Nicholls, Michael E. R., Jason D. Forte, Tobias Loetscher, et al.. (2011). Near, yet so far: The effect of pictorial cues on spatial attention. Brain and Cognition. 76(3). 349–352. 6 indexed citations
12.
Nicholls, Michael E. R., et al.. (2011). The importance of response type to the relationship between temporal order and numerical magnitude. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 73(5). 1604–1613. 19 indexed citations
13.
Yates, Mark & Michael E. R. Nicholls. (2011). Somatosensory prior entry assessed with temporal order judgments and simultaneity judgments. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 73(5). 1586–1603. 24 indexed citations
14.
Yates, Mark. (2010). The influence of semantic neighbours on visual word recognition. Journal of Research in Reading. 35(2). 215–226. 2 indexed citations
15.
Yates, Mark & Michael E. R. Nicholls. (2009). Somatosensory prior entry. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 71(4). 847–859. 27 indexed citations
16.
Yates, Mark. (2009). Investigating the importance of the least supported phoneme on visual word naming. Cognition. 115(1). 197–201. 4 indexed citations
17.
Yates, Mark, John Friend, & Danielle M. Ploetz. (2008). Phonological neighbors influence word naming through the least supported phoneme.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 34(6). 1599–1608. 10 indexed citations
18.
Yates, Mark, Lawrence Locker, & Greg B. Simpson. (2004). The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 11(3). 452–457. 86 indexed citations
19.
Locker, Lawrence, Greg B. Simpson, & Mark Yates. (2003). Semantic neighborhood effects on the recognition of ambiguous words. Memory & Cognition. 31(4). 505–515. 41 indexed citations
20.
Yates, Mark, Lawrence Locker, & Greg B. Simpson. (2003). Semantic and phonological influences on the processing of words and pseudohomophones. Memory & Cognition. 31(6). 856–866. 42 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. A. Junge Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christian Forkstam Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anna Maria Di Betta Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Adam Chuderski Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Qing Cai Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Katharine Graf Estes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Louisa Bogaerts Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by James Bartolotti Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Cara H. Cashon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mike Page
Rankless by CCL
2026