Steven S. Smith

2.9k total citations
59 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Steven S. Smith is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Steven S. Smith has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 43 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 13 papers in Strategy and Management and 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Steven S. Smith's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (37 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (13 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (7 papers). Steven S. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (37 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (13 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (7 papers). Steven S. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Steven S. Smith's co-authors include Thomas F. Remington, Jason M. Roberts, Patrick Tucker, Moshe Haspel, Eric Lawrence, Forrest Maltzman, Sarah A. Binder, Betsy Sinclair, Ryan J. Vander Wielen and Christopher Claassen and has published in prestigious journals such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science and Foreign Affairs.

In The Last Decade

Steven S. Smith

53 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Countries citing papers authored by Steven S. Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven S. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven S. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven S. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven S. Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven S. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven S. Smith. The network helps show where Steven S. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven S. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven S. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven S. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven S. Smith. Steven S. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

#	Work	Indexed citations
1	Senate Republican Radicalism and the Need for Filibuster Reform 2021 ·The Forum ·Steven S. Smith	1
2	Changes in Candidate Evaluations over the Campaign Season: A Comparison of House, Senate, and Presidential Races 2020 ·Political Behavior ·Patrick Tucker, Steven S. Smith	3
3	Revisiting Bedrock Values: The Stability and Predictive Power of the Society Works Best Index 2017 ·American Politics Research ·Michelle Torres, Steven S. Smith	2
4	Partisanship, Sophistication, and Public Attitudes about Majority Rule and Minority Rights in Congress 2016 ·Legislative Studies Quarterly ·(unknown), Steven S. Smith	9
5	The Dimensionality of Congressional Voting Reconsidered 2015 ·American Politics Research ·Jason M. Roberts, Steven S. Smith, (unknown)	13
6	Ideological Labels in America 2014 ·Political Behavior ·Christopher Claassen, Patrick Tucker, Steven S. Smith	33
7	Majority Party Power and Procedural Motions in the U.S. Senate 2013 ·Legislative Studies Quarterly ·Steven S. Smith, (unknown), (unknown)	16
8	Americans’ Attitudes About the Senate Filibuster 2013 ·American Politics Research ·Steven S. Smith, (unknown)	22
9	Majority Party Bias in U.S. Congressional Conference Committees 2011 ·Congress & the Presidency ·Ryan J. Vander Wielen, Steven S. Smith	6
10	Reforming the Presidential Nomination Process 2009 ·Brookings Institution Press eBooks ·Steven S. Smith, (unknown)	5
11	Going Nuclear, Senate Style 2007 ·Perspectives on Politics ·Sarah A. Binder, (unknown), Steven S. Smith	30
12	Procedural Contexts, Party Strategy, and Conditional Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1971-2000 2003 ·American Journal of Political Science ·Jason M. Roberts, Steven S. Smith	18
13	<title>User interface for the control of the Gemini Telescopes</title> 1997 ·Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE ·Steven S. Smith, (unknown)	0
14	The early legislative process in the Russian federal assembly 1996 ·Journal of Legislative Studies ·Thomas F. Remington, Steven S. Smith	9
15	The Development of Parliamentary Parties in Russia 1995 ·Legislative Studies Quarterly ·Thomas F. Remington, Steven S. Smith	39
16	Principals, Goals, Dimensionality, and Congressional Committees 1994 ·Legislative Studies Quarterly ·Forrest Maltzman, Steven S. Smith	9
17	Floor Politics in Transition 1989 ·The Brookings Review ·Steven S. Smith	0
18	An Essay on Sequence, Position, Goals, and Committee Power 1988 ·Legislative Studies Quarterly ·Steven S. Smith	18
19	The Iran Arms Sale and the Intelligence Oversight Act of 1980 1987 ·PS ·James M. McCormick, Steven S. Smith	0
20	Generational Change and the Allocation of Staff in the U. S. Congress 1983 ·Legislative Studies Quarterly ·(unknown), Steven S. Smith	9

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact