Danielle Macbeth
- Theoretical Computer Science top 5%
- History and Theory of Mathematics 4
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History 6
- Historical Philosophy and Science 5
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 7
- Philosophy top 5%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 3
- Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education 2
-
- Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques 1
-
- Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing 1
- Co-authors
- Wilfrid SellarsWillem A. deVries
- Cited by
- Theoretical Computer ScienceHistory and Philosophy of ScienceExperimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Danielle Macbeth
19 papers receiving 115 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Theoretical Computer Science 38
- History and Philosophy of Science 56
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 63
- Philosophy 52
- Geometry and Topology 10
Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Macbeth
This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Macbeth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Macbeth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Macbeth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Macbeth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Macbeth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Macbeth. The network helps show where Danielle Macbeth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Macbeth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 10 | Meaning, Use, and Diagrams | 2009 | 5 |
| 11 | Logical Analysis, Reduction, and Philosophical Understanding | 2007 | 0 |
| 12 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 14 | Frege's logic | 2005 | 17 |
| 15 | 2004 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 10 | |
| 19 | 1995 | 14 | |
| 20 | 1995 | 2 |
About Danielle Macbeth
Danielle Macbeth is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Anthropology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 146 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (6 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (5 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (2 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (1 paper) and Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (38 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (56 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (63 citations), Philosophy (52 citations) and Geometry and Topology (10 citations). Danielle Macbeth has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Wilfrid Sellars and Willem A. deVries. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophical Studies, Synthese, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Croatian Journal of Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.