Mark Tewdwr‐Jones

5.7k total citations · 2 hit papers
143 papers, 3.7k citations indexed

About

Mark Tewdwr‐Jones is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Political Science and International Relations and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Tewdwr‐Jones has authored 143 papers receiving a total of 3.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 58 papers in Urban Studies, 38 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 21 papers in Finance. Recurrent topics in Mark Tewdwr‐Jones's work include Urban Planning and Governance (45 papers), Urbanization and City Planning (22 papers) and Rural development and sustainability (21 papers). Mark Tewdwr‐Jones is often cited by papers focused on Urban Planning and Governance (45 papers), Urbanization and City Planning (22 papers) and Rural development and sustainability (21 papers). Mark Tewdwr‐Jones collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Mark Tewdwr‐Jones's co-authors include Philip Allmendinger, Nick Gallent, Phil Allmendinger, Peter Hall, Nicholas A. Phelps, Alan Mace, Alexander Wilson, Donald McNeill, Janice Morphet and Rob Comber and has published in prestigious journals such as Urban Studies, Environment and Planning A Economy and Space and Regional Studies.

In The Last Decade

Mark Tewdwr‐Jones

136 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies

1998 629 citations Mark Tewdwr‐Jones profile →
Deconstructing Communicative Rationality: A Critique of Habermasian Collaborative Planning

1998 304 citations Mark Tewdwr‐Jones et al. profile →

Peers

Mark Tewdwr‐Jones

US

PSIR

SPS

FINAN

GABS

Graham Haughton United Kingdom

Mark Purcell United States

Frank Moulaert Belgium

Andrew E. G. Jonas United Kingdom

Eugene McCann Canada

Louis Albrechts Belgium

Ivan Turok United Kingdom

Andreas Faludi Netherlands

Simin Davoudi United Kingdom

Susan S. Fainstein United States

Graham Haughton United Kingdom

Mark Tewdwr‐Jones

1.4k ×0.9

US

1.1k ×1.2

PSIR

695 ×0.9

SPS

624 ×1.0

FINAN

288 ×0.6

GABS

Citations per year, relative to Mark Tewdwr‐Jones Mark Tewdwr‐Jones (= 1×) peers Graham Haughton

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Tewdwr‐Jones

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Tewdwr‐Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Tewdwr‐Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Tewdwr‐Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Tewdwr‐Jones

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Tewdwr‐Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Tewdwr‐Jones. The network helps show where Mark Tewdwr‐Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Tewdwr‐Jones

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Tewdwr‐Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Tewdwr‐Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Tewdwr‐Jones. Mark Tewdwr‐Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Wilson, Alexander, et al.. (2024). Public engagement, digital technology and transport: engaging through open, early and experience-centred perspectives at scale. Contemporary Social Science. 20(1). 7–26.

2.

Tewdwr‐Jones, Mark, et al.. (2023). Mind the gap: revitalizing action planning through social networks in Yogyakarta. International Planning Studies. 29(1). 34–53. 1 indexed citations

3.

Dixon, Tim & Mark Tewdwr‐Jones. (2021). Urban Futures. Policy Press eBooks. 6 indexed citations

4.

Harrison, John, Daniel Galland, & Mark Tewdwr‐Jones. (2021). Whither regional planning?. Regional Studies. 55(1). 1–5. 20 indexed citations

5.

Kempton, Louise, et al.. (2021). 4. Placing universities and regional relationships in context. 3(1). 45–60. 1 indexed citations

6.

Kempton, Louise, et al.. (2021). 5. Putting universities in their place: The ORPHIC Framework. 3(1). 61–77. 1 indexed citations

7.

Harrison, John, Daniel Galland, & Mark Tewdwr‐Jones. (2020). Regional planning is dead: long live planning regional futures. Regional Studies. 55(1). 6–18. 36 indexed citations

8.

Tewdwr‐Jones, Mark & John Goddard. (2014). A future for cities? Building new methodologies and systems for urban foresight. Town Planning Review. 85(6). 773–794. 14 indexed citations

9.

Tewdwr‐Jones, Mark, et al.. (2013). The form and organisation of urban areas: Colin Buchanan and Traffic in Towns 50 years on. Town Planning Review. 84(3). 313–336. 4 indexed citations

10.

Tewdwr‐Jones, Mark. (2008). Commentary: The complexity of planning reform: a search for the spirit and purpose of planning. Town Planning Review. 79(6). 673–688. 11 indexed citations

11.

Gallent, Nick, Janice Morphet, & Mark Tewdwr‐Jones. (2008). Parish plans and the spatial planning approach in England. Town Planning Review. 79(1). 1–29. 16 indexed citations

12.

Tewdwr‐Jones, Mark, et al.. (2005). Territorial cohesion, economic growth and the desire for European 'balanced competitiveness'. Town Planning Review. 76(1). 69–80. 14 indexed citations

13.

Gallent, Nick, Alan Mace, & Mark Tewdwr‐Jones. (2004). Second homes: A new framework for policy. Town Planning Review. 75(3). 287–308. 13 indexed citations

14.

Tewdwr‐Jones, Mark. (2004). Spatial Planning: principles, practice and culture. UCL Discovery (University College London). 5 indexed citations

15.

Mace, Alan, et al.. (2003). Second homes: a plan of action?. UCL Discovery (University College London). 1 indexed citations

16.

Williams, Richard H. & Mark Tewdwr‐Jones. (2002). The European Dimension of British Planning. BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library). 1 indexed citations

17.

Gallent, Nick & Mark Tewdwr‐Jones. (2001). Second and holiday homes and the land use planning system. UCL Discovery (University College London). 1 indexed citations

18.

Tewdwr‐Jones, Mark, et al.. (2001). Use class answer to second-home ills?. UCL Discovery (University College London). 1 indexed citations

19.

Tewdwr‐Jones, Mark, et al.. (2000). From spatial to local: the impact of the EU on local authority planning in Britain. UCL Discovery (University College London). 4 indexed citations

20.

Tewdwr‐Jones, Mark, et al.. (1998). Developing corporate approaches for the provision of affordable housing in Wales. UCL Discovery (University College London). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact