Mark Purcell
- Urban Studies top 0.02%
- Urban Planning and Governance 20
- Geography, Planning and Development top 0.5%
- Public Administration top 2%
- Finance top 1%
- Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism 8
-
- Local Government Finance and Decentralization 3
-
- Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies 6
- Political theory and Gramsci 6
- Political Economy and Marxism 5
- Foucault, Power, and Ethics 3
-
- Critical Theory and Political Philosophy 5
- Co-authors
- Branden BornJ. Christopher BrownJoseph NevinsRenzo RuisiDeborah MartinEugene McCannChristian BaillyFrançois Hamy
- Journals
- Urban Geography (5 papers)Planning Theory & Practice (3 papers)Journal of Urban Affairs (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Mark Purcell
59 papers receiving 4.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Urban Studies 1.9k
- Geography, Planning and Development 305
- Public Administration 190
- Finance 527
- Political Science and International Relations 969
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Purcell
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Purcell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Purcell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Purcell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Purcell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Purcell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Purcell. The network helps show where Mark Purcell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Purcell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 102 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 37 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 317 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 41 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 68 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 63 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 56 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 39 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 3 |
About Mark Purcell
Mark Purcell is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Library and Information Sciences, Finance, Sociology and Political Science and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 62 papers that have together received 4.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban Planning and Governance (20 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (8 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (6 papers), Political theory and Gramsci (6 papers), Critical Theory and Political Philosophy (5 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (5 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (3 papers) and Local Government Finance and Decentralization (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (1.9k citations), Geography, Planning and Development (305 citations), Public Administration (190 citations), Finance (527 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (969 citations). Mark Purcell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Branden Born, J. Christopher Brown, Joseph Nevins, Renzo Ruisi, Deborah Martin, Eugene McCann, Christian Bailly, François Hamy, Michael J. Waring and Theresa Enright. Their work appears in journals such as Urban Geography, Planning Theory & Practice, Journal of Urban Affairs, Space and Polity and International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.