Mark ter Laan
Impact in
- Genetics top 2%
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Informatics top 5%
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Pieter Wesseling (4 shared papers)William P. J. Leenders (4 shared papers)Krissie Lenting (3 shared papers)J. Marc C. van Dijk (6 shared papers)Roel G.W. Verhaak (1 shared paper)Barbara M. Schulte (3 shared papers)Paul R. Gielen (3 shared papers)Esther D. Kers‐Rebel (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Acta Neurochirurgica (6 papers)Journal of Neuro-Oncology (5 papers)World Neurosurgery (3 papers)Cancers (3 papers)Journal of neurosurgery (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Mark ter Laan
48 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Genetics 375
- Health Informatics 25
- Neurology 132
- Neurology 240
- Immunology 245
Countries citing papers authored by Mark ter Laan
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark ter Laan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark ter Laan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark ter Laan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark ter Laan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark ter Laan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark ter Laan. The network helps show where Mark ter Laan may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark ter Laan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 212 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 135 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 127 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 92 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 61 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 57 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 49 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 44 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 36 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 35 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 34 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 29 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 26 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 21 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 15 |
About Mark ter Laan
Mark ter Laan is a scholar working on Genetics, Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (21 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (10 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (9 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (7 papers), Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (4 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (4 papers) and Immune cells in cancer (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (375 citations), Health Informatics (25 citations), Neurology (132 citations), Neurology (240 citations) and Immunology (245 citations). Mark ter Laan has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Pieter Wesseling, William P. J. Leenders, Krissie Lenting, J. Marc C. van Dijk, Roel G.W. Verhaak, Barbara M. Schulte, Paul R. Gielen, Esther D. Kers‐Rebel, Gosse J. Adema and Jan Willem J. Elting. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Neurochirurgica, Journal of Neuro-Oncology, World Neurosurgery, Cancers and Journal of neurosurgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.