Mark T. Werth

22 papers receiving 742 citations

Peers

Mark T. Werth
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 231
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 183
  • Inorganic Chemistry 152
  • Spectroscopy 88
  • Organic Chemistry 151
Replace G.R. Moore with:
G.R. Moore United Kingdom
Eckard Muenck United States
Łukasz Szyrwiel Poland
Rhonda A. Torres United States
Marly K. Eidsness United States
Hiroaki Koga Japan
E. Joseph Billo United States
Elizabeth G. Pavel United States
Dmytro Bykov United States
Jonathan L. Cape United States
Mark T. Werth relative to G.R. Moore United Kingdom G.R. Moore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
G.R. Moore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark T. Werth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark T. Werth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark T. Werth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark T. Werth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark T. Werth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark T. Werth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark T. Werth. The network helps show where Mark T. Werth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark T. Werth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark T. Werth Line = papers co-authored together Mark T. Werth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199267
2 198565
3 199062
4 199161
5 199558
6 199257
7 199552
8 200948
9 199044
10 198939
11 200633
12 199232
13 199131
14 198729
15 199328
16 199425
17 198917
18 199417
19 19937
20 19966

About Mark T. Werth

Mark T. Werth is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Molecular Biology, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Spectroscopy, having authored 22 papers that have together received 782 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (6 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (4 papers), Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins (4 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (2 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (2 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (2 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (231 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (183 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (152 citations), Spectroscopy (88 citations) and Organic Chemistry (151 citations). Mark T. Werth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include H. W. Spieß, Donald M. Kurtz, Michael K. Johnson, Gary Cecchini, Robert P. Gunsalus, S. U. Vallerien, Imke Schröder, Francesco Bonomi, Johannes Leisen and Christine Boeffel. Their work appears in journals such as Liquid Crystals, Biochemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Journal de Physique II.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact