Mark T. Strong
Impact in
-
- Plant and animal studies
- Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Horticulture top 10%
Papers in
-
- Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies 24
- Botany and Plant Ecology Studies 6
- Anthropology 15
- Archaeology and Natural History 15
- Co-authors
- Pedro Acevedo‐Rodríguez (3 shared papers)Rudolf Schmid (1 shared paper)Kenneth J. Wurdack (1 shared paper)Genise Vieira Somner (1 shared paper)María Silvia Ferrucci (1 shared paper)Gabriel Johnson (1 shared paper)Víctor W. Steinmann (1 shared paper)Pedro Henrique dos Santos Dias (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Taxon (2 papers)The Botanical Review (1 paper)Systematic Botany (1 paper)Novon A Journal for Botanical Nomenclature (7 papers)Brittonia (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandBelgium
In The Last Decade
Mark T. Strong
24 papers receiving 464 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 336
- Horticulture 12
- Plant Science 270
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 72
- Forestry 20
Countries citing papers authored by Mark T. Strong
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark T. Strong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark T. Strong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark T. Strong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark T. Strong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark T. Strong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark T. Strong. The network helps show where Mark T. Strong may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark T. Strong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 250 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2008 | 1 |
About Mark T. Strong
Mark T. Strong is a scholar working on Plant Science, Anthropology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Food Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (24 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (15 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Botanical Research and Applications (7 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (6 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (6 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (5 papers) and Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (336 citations), Horticulture (12 citations), Plant Science (270 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (72 citations) and Forestry (20 citations). Mark T. Strong has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Pedro Acevedo‐Rodríguez, Rudolf Schmid, Kenneth J. Wurdack, Genise Vieira Somner, María Silvia Ferrucci, Gabriel Johnson, Víctor W. Steinmann, Pedro Henrique dos Santos Dias, Elizabeth A. Zimmer and Róbert Král. Their work appears in journals such as Taxon, The Botanical Review, Systematic Botany, Novon A Journal for Botanical Nomenclature and Brittonia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.