Mark T. Friedman

24 papers receiving 369 citations

Peers

Mark T. Friedman
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Biochemistry 146
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 99
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 103
  • Family Practice 31
  • Emergency Medicine 34
Replace Elianna Saidenberg with:
Elianna Saidenberg Canada
Dania Fischer Germany
Marie Bruyère France
H Cohen United States
Gregory Pattakos United States
Joost A. van Hilten Netherlands
Michelle Brown United Kingdom
Cara Hudson United Kingdom
D. Hines United States
William H. Chamberlin United States
Mark T. Friedman relative to Elianna Saidenberg Canada Elianna Saidenberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.3×
Elianna Saidenberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark T. Friedman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark T. Friedman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark T. Friedman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark T. Friedman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark T. Friedman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark T. Friedman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark T. Friedman. The network helps show where Mark T. Friedman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark T. Friedman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark T. Friedman Line = papers co-authored together Mark T. Friedman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199569
2 202053
3 201146
4 201236
5 200631
6 202028
7 200628
8 199120
9 196314
10 202014
11 20168
12 20167
13 20146
14 20156
15 20224
16 20144
17 20083
18 20182
19 20231
20 20241

About Mark T. Friedman

Mark T. Friedman is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Management of Technology and Innovation, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 25 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood transfusion and management (15 papers), Blood donation and transfusion practices (11 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (10 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers), Radiology practices and education (2 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (2 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (146 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (99 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (103 citations), Family Practice (31 citations) and Emergency Medicine (34 citations). Mark T. Friedman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Fahad Khan, Gilad E. Amiel, Suzanne Arinsburg, Joel J. Roslyn, Melissa M. Cushing, Donna Skerrett, Patrice Gabler Blair, Laurie A. Loiacono, Emilio Madrigal and Zachary Grimes. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Transfusion, Journal of Clinical Apheresis and Life.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact