Dania Fischer
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 5%
- Hematology
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 5%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Patrick MeybohmKai ZacharowskiMarkus MüllerChristof GeisenChristian WeberAnja UrbschatMarkus WeigandElisabeth Adam
- Topics
- Blood transfusion and management (17 papers)Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (9 papers)Blood donation and transfusion practices (7 papers)
- Cited by
- BiochemistryCritical Care and Intensive Care MedicineManagement of Technology and Innovation
- Partner nations
- GermanyDenmarkUnited States
In The Last Decade
Dania Fischer
32 papers receiving 332 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Biochemistry 163
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 97
- Hematology 61
- Management of Technology and Innovation 58
- Surgery 49
Countries citing papers authored by Dania Fischer
This map shows the geographic impact of Dania Fischer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dania Fischer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dania Fischer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dania Fischer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dania Fischer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dania Fischer. The network helps show where Dania Fischer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dania Fischer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dania Fischer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dania Fischer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dania Fischer. Dania Fischer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Dania Fischer
Dania Fischer is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 41 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood transfusion and management (17 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (9 papers) and Blood donation and transfusion practices (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (163 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (97 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (58 citations). Dania Fischer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include Patrick Meybohm, Kai Zacharowski, Markus Müller, Christof Geisen, Christian Weber, Anja Urbschat, Markus Weigand, Elisabeth Adam, Erhard Seifried and Carla Jennewein. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Critical Care and Cell and Tissue Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.