Mark Silk
Impact in
- Health top 5%
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
-
- Religion and Society Interactions
- Religion, Society, and Development
- Social and Intergroup Psychology
Papers in
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 11
-
- Religion and Society Interactions 6
- Religion, Society, and Development 2
- Vietnamese History and Culture Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Kevin J. Christiano (1 shared paper)James A. Beckford (1 shared paper)Christopher F. Armstrong (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (2 papers)Review of Religious Research (2 papers)Journal of American History (2 papers)Journal of the American Academy of Religion (2 papers)Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaCanada
In The Last Decade
Mark Silk
15 papers receiving 586 citations
Mark Silk's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Health 226
- Sociology and Political Science 524
- Political Science and International Relations 174
- Philosophy 64
- Communication 38
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Silk
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Silk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Silk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Silk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Silk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Silk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Silk. The network helps show where Mark Silk may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Mark Silk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 472 |
| 2 | 1984 | 61 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 26 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1982 | 23 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 8 | |
| 11 | Sporting Ethnography: Philosophy, Methodology & Reflection | 2005 | 5 |
| 12 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 0 |
About Mark Silk
Mark Silk is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, History and Philosophy, having authored 21 papers that have together received 681 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (11 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (6 papers), Catholicism and Religious Studies (2 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (2 papers), Media, Religion, Digital Communication (2 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (226 citations), Sociology and Political Science (524 citations), Political Science and International Relations (174 citations), Philosophy (64 citations) and Communication (38 citations). Mark Silk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kevin J. Christiano, James A. Beckford and Christopher F. Armstrong. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Review of Religious Research, Journal of American History, Journal of the American Academy of Religion and Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.