Caroline Tiliket

448 total citations
9 papers, 354 citations indexed

About

Caroline Tiliket is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology and Ophthalmology. According to data from OpenAlex, Caroline Tiliket has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 354 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 6 papers in Neurology and 3 papers in Ophthalmology. Recurrent topics in Caroline Tiliket's work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (6 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (5 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers). Caroline Tiliket is often cited by papers focused on Vestibular and auditory disorders (6 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (5 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers). Caroline Tiliket collaborates with scholars based in France, United States and Australia. Caroline Tiliket's co-authors include Gilles Rode, Dominique Boisson, David S. Zee, Mark Shelhamer, Dale Roberts, H. Stevie Tan, Alain Vighetto, Yves Rossetti, Christiane Caudie and Jason B. Mattingley and has published in prestigious journals such as Experimental Brain Research, Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine and Journal of Vestibular Research.

In The Last Decade

Caroline Tiliket

9 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Caroline Tiliket France	7	180	144	112	85	78	9	354
Alejo Suárez Uruguay	10	163 0.9×	89 0.6×	53 0.5×	134 1.6×	33 0.4×	21	354
José Fernando Colafêmina Brazil	11	83 0.5×	99 0.7×	43 0.4×	60 0.7×	19 0.2×	40	289
Thanh-Thuan Lê France	11	120 0.7×	141 1.0×	54 0.5×	160 1.9×	13 0.2×	15	358
Ivan Augimeri Italy	9	188 1.0×	24 0.2×	63 0.6×	65 0.8×	37 0.5×	9	283
E. Ionescu France	11	182 1.0×	76 0.5×	53 0.5×	112 1.3×	8 0.1×	38	402
Alidz Pambakian United Kingdom	10	77 0.4×	444 3.1×	62 0.6×	25 0.3×	20 0.3×	10	626
Annalisa Meli Italy	9	220 1.2×	51 0.4×	79 0.7×	100 1.2×	13 0.2×	13	363
Akiyoshi Matsugi Japan	13	284 1.6×	150 1.0×	92 0.8×	56 0.7×	42 0.5×	56	400
Mário Edvin Greters Brazil	7	94 0.5×	50 0.3×	46 0.4×	229 2.7×	186 2.4×	11	382
Marcela Davalos-Bichara United States	8	320 1.8×	79 0.5×	119 1.1×	113 1.3×	7 0.1×	10	401

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Tiliket

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Tiliket's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Tiliket with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Tiliket more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Tiliket

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Tiliket. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Tiliket. The network helps show where Caroline Tiliket may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caroline Tiliket

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caroline Tiliket. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caroline Tiliket based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caroline Tiliket. Caroline Tiliket is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Mattingley, Jason B., Laure Pisella, Yves Rossetti, et al.. (2000). Visual extinction in oculocentric coordinates: A selective bias in dividing attention between hemifields. Neurocase. 6(6). 465–475. 7 indexed citations

2.

Cheillan, David, et al.. (1999). [A surprising aglycorrachia! A case of neurocysticercosis].. PubMed. 57(3). 356–9. 6 indexed citations

3.

Cheillan, David, et al.. (1999). What a surprising aglycorrachia ! About a case of neurocysticercosis. Annales de biologie clinique. 57(3). 1 indexed citations

4.

Rode, Gilles, et al.. (1998). Stimulation calorique vestibulaire et contrôle postural du sujet hémiplégique. Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique. 41(5). 251–256. 2 indexed citations

5.

Rode, Gilles, Caroline Tiliket, & Dominique Boisson. (1997). Predominance of postural imbalance in left hemiparetic patients. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 29(1). 11–16. 136 indexed citations

6.

Tiliket, Caroline. (1996). Room Tilt Illusion. Archives of Neurology. 53(12). 1259–1259. 39 indexed citations

7.

Tiliket, Caroline, Mark Shelhamer, Dale Roberts, & David S. Zee. (1994). Short-term vestibulo-ocular reflex adaptation in humans. Experimental Brain Research. 100(2). 316–27. 44 indexed citations

8.

Shelhamer, Mark, et al.. (1994). Short-term vestibulo-ocular reflex adaptation in humans. Experimental Brain Research. 100(2). 328–36. 82 indexed citations

9.

Tiliket, Caroline, Mark Shelhamer, H. Stevie Tan, & David S. Zee. (1993). Adaptation of the Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex with the Head in Different Orientations and Positions Relative to the Axis of Body Rotation. Journal of Vestibular Research. 3(2). 181–195. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact