Countries citing papers authored by Mark Schreiner
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Schreiner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Schreiner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Schreiner more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Schreiner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Schreiner. The network helps show where Mark Schreiner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Schreiner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Schreiner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Schreiner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Schreiner. Mark Schreiner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hirzel, Simon, Patrick Plötz, Clemens Rohde, et al.. (2017). What`s going on in energy Efficiency Research? A platform to enhance the transparency of energy Research funding in Germany. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft).2 indexed citations
Schreiner, Mark. (2012). Estimating Consumption- Based Poverty in the Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey. 21(1). 73–106.4 indexed citations
5.
Schreiner, Mark. (2011). Estimating Expenditure-Based Poverty from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 34(4). 65–94.2 indexed citations
6.
Schreiner, Mark. (2009). A Simple Poverty Scorecard for the Philippines. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.6 indexed citations
Schreiner, Mark. (2005). Asset-building in rural areas. Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis).1 indexed citations
9.
Schreiner, Mark. (2004). Scoring Arrears at a Microlender in Bolivia. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 6(2). 65–88.36 indexed citations
Schreiner, Mark. (2002). Evaluation and Microenterprise Programs in the United States. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 4(2). 67–92.10 indexed citations
12.
Schreiner, Mark. (2001). Development Finance Institutions: Measuring Their Subsidy. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.9 indexed citations
13.
Beverly, Sondra G., et al.. (2001). Saving and Asset-Accumulation Strategies Used by Low-Income Individuals. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.3 indexed citations
14.
Schreiner, Mark. (2001). Seven Aspects of Loan Size. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 3(2). 27–47.29 indexed citations
15.
Schreiner, Mark. (2001). Scoring Drop-Out at a Microlender in Bolivia. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.4 indexed citations
16.
Schreiner, Mark. (2000). Credit Scoring for Microfinance: Can It Work?. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 2(2). 105–118.29 indexed citations
Schreiner, Mark, et al.. (1998). Predicting Creditworthiness With Publicly Observable Characteristics: Evidence From ASCRAs and RoSCAs in the Gambia. 22(4). 399–414.14 indexed citations
19.
González‐Vega, Claudio, et al.. (1996). Microfinance Market Niches And Client Profiles In Bolivia. Computational Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.