Clinton Key
Impact in
- Accounting top 5%
- Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
Papers in
-
- Housing Market and Economics 12
- Healthcare Policy and Management 2
- Accounting 15
- Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis 15
- Co-authors
- Michal Grinstein‐Weiss (15 shared papers)William G. Gale (7 shared papers)Shenyang Guo (4 shared papers)William M. Rohe (7 shared papers)Michael Sherraden (7 shared papers)Mark Schreiner (7 shared papers)Charles Kurzman (2 shared papers)Mairead Moloney (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Consumer Affairs (2 papers)Housing Policy Debate (2 papers)Economics of Education Review (1 paper)Urban Studies (1 paper)Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Clinton Key
17 papers receiving 302 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Accounting 163
- Gender Studies 118
- Finance 74
- Economics and Econometrics 160
- Communication 26
Countries citing papers authored by Clinton Key
This map shows the geographic impact of Clinton Key's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clinton Key with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinton Key more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clinton Key
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clinton Key. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clinton Key. The network helps show where Clinton Key may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Clinton Key, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 76 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 43 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 0 |
About Clinton Key
Clinton Key is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Finance, having authored 18 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (15 papers), Housing Market and Economics (12 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (5 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (4 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (3 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (163 citations), Gender Studies (118 citations), Finance (74 citations), Economics and Econometrics (160 citations) and Communication (26 citations). Clinton Key has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Michal Grinstein‐Weiss, William G. Gale, Shenyang Guo, William M. Rohe, Michael Sherraden, Mark Schreiner, Charles Kurzman, Mairead Moloney, Alexis M. Silver and Pajarita Charles. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consumer Affairs, Housing Policy Debate, Economics of Education Review, Urban Studies and Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.