Clinton Key

479 total citations
18 papers, 349 citations indexed

About

Clinton Key is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Accounting and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Clinton Key has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 349 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 15 papers in Accounting and 6 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Clinton Key's work include Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (15 papers), Housing Market and Economics (12 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (5 papers). Clinton Key is often cited by papers focused on Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (15 papers), Housing Market and Economics (12 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (5 papers). Clinton Key collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and South Korea. Clinton Key's co-authors include Michal Grinstein‐Weiss, William G. Gale, Shenyang Guo, Michael Sherraden, Mark Schreiner, William M. Rohe, Alexis M. Silver, Mairead Moloney, Charles Kurzman and Kim Manturuk and has published in prestigious journals such as Urban Studies, Economics of Education Review and American Economic Journal Economic Policy.

In The Last Decade

Clinton Key

17 papers receiving 302 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Clinton Key United States 12 163 160 118 110 74 18 349
Mariko Lin Chang United States 6 119 0.7× 128 0.8× 169 1.4× 208 1.9× 70 0.9× 6 421
Saul Schwartz Canada 12 108 0.7× 153 1.0× 120 1.0× 116 1.1× 23 0.3× 54 463
Raphaël Charron‐Chénier United States 8 71 0.4× 87 0.5× 25 0.2× 160 1.5× 74 1.0× 13 333
Dayanand Manoli United States 5 129 0.8× 221 1.4× 123 1.0× 80 0.7× 22 0.3× 7 420
Mark Hyde United Kingdom 12 78 0.5× 52 0.3× 37 0.3× 100 0.9× 78 1.1× 47 398
Fidan Ana Kurtulus United States 9 72 0.4× 129 0.8× 147 1.2× 132 1.2× 22 0.3× 17 373
Julian McCrae United Kingdom 6 66 0.4× 216 1.4× 292 2.5× 125 1.1× 14 0.2× 15 406
Belinda Creel Davis United States 8 33 0.2× 81 0.5× 61 0.5× 168 1.5× 17 0.2× 20 352
Charles A. Calhoun United States 10 45 0.3× 108 0.7× 87 0.7× 405 3.7× 44 0.6× 21 572
Michela Redoano United Kingdom 13 188 1.2× 406 2.5× 13 0.1× 88 0.8× 21 0.3× 26 566

Countries citing papers authored by Clinton Key

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clinton Key's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clinton Key with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinton Key more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clinton Key

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clinton Key. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clinton Key. The network helps show where Clinton Key may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clinton Key

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clinton Key. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clinton Key based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clinton Key. Clinton Key is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Grinstein‐Weiss, Michal, et al.. (2016). Do Tax-Time Savings Deposits Reduce Hardship Among Low-Income Filers? A Propensity Score Analysis. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research. 7(4). 707–728. 18 indexed citations
2.
Rohe, William M., Clinton Key, Michal Grinstein‐Weiss, Mark Schreiner, & Michael Sherraden. (2016). The Impacts of Individual Development Accounts, Assets, and Debt on Future Orientation and Psychological Depression. Journal of Policy Practice. 16(1). 24–45. 8 indexed citations
3.
Grinstein‐Weiss, Michal, et al.. (2016). Behavioral Interventions to Increase Tax‐Time Saving: Evidence from a National Randomized Trial. Journal of Consumer Affairs. 51(1). 3–26. 29 indexed citations
4.
Grinstein‐Weiss, Michal, Michael Sherraden, William G. Gale, et al.. (2015). Effects of an Individual Development Account Program on Retirement Saving: Follow-up Evidence From a Randomized Experiment. Journal of Gerontological Social Work. 58(6). 572–589. 11 indexed citations
5.
Key, Clinton, et al.. (2015). Tax‐Time Savings among Low‐Income Households in the $aveNYC Program. Journal of Consumer Affairs. 49(3). 489–518. 20 indexed citations
6.
Grinstein‐Weiss, Michal, et al.. (2015). Homeownership, the Great Recession, and Wealth: Evidence From the Survey of Consumer Finances. Housing Policy Debate. 25(3). 419–445. 15 indexed citations
7.
Grinstein‐Weiss, Michal, Kim Manturuk, Shenyang Guo, Pajarita Charles, & Clinton Key. (2014). The Impact of Homeownership on Marriage and Divorce: Evidence from Propensity Score Matching. Social Work Research. 38(2). 73–90. 11 indexed citations
8.
Kurzman, Charles, et al.. (2014). Powerblindness. Sociology Compass. 8(6). 718–730. 2 indexed citations
9.
Grinstein‐Weiss, Michal, Michael Sherraden, William G. Gale, et al.. (2013). Individual Development Accounts and Post-Secondary Education: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations
10.
Grinstein‐Weiss, Michal, Michael Sherraden, William G. Gale, et al.. (2013). Long-Term Impacts of Individual Development Accounts on Homeownership among Baseline Renters: Follow-Up Evidence from a Randomized Experiment. American Economic Journal Economic Policy. 5(1). 122–145. 33 indexed citations
11.
Grinstein‐Weiss, Michal, Michael Sherraden, William G. Gale, et al.. (2013). Long-term effects of Individual Development Accounts on postsecondary education: Follow-up evidence from a randomized experiment. Economics of Education Review. 33. 58–68. 26 indexed citations
12.
Key, Clinton. (2013). Saving Behavior in Response to Motivational Prompts: Evidence from the Refund to Savings Experiment. Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis).
13.
Grinstein‐Weiss, Michal, et al.. (2013). Homeownership and Wealth among Low- and Moderate-Income Households. Housing Policy Debate. 23(2). 259–279. 43 indexed citations
14.
Grinstein‐Weiss, Michal, Michael Sherraden, William M. Rohe, et al.. (2012). Long-Term Follow-Up of Individual Development Accounts: Evidence from the ADD Experiment. SSRN Electronic Journal. 12 indexed citations
15.
Grinstein‐Weiss, Michal, et al.. (2012). Homeownership, Neighbourhood Characteristics and Children’s Positive Behaviours among Low- and Moderate-income Households. Urban Studies. 49(16). 3545–3563. 16 indexed citations
16.
Grinstein‐Weiss, Michal, Pajarita Charles, Shenyang Guo, Kim Manturuk, & Clinton Key. (2011). The Effect of Marital Status on Home Ownership among Low-Income Households. Social Service Review. 85(3). 475–503. 19 indexed citations
17.
Grinstein‐Weiss, Michal, Michael Sherraden, William G. Gale, et al.. (2011). The Ten-Year Impacts of Individual Development Accounts on Homeownership: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations
18.
Kurzman, Charles, et al.. (2007). Celebrity Status. Sociological Theory. 25(4). 347–367. 76 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026