Mark Sandford

791 citations
45 papers · 452 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Sandford

42 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

Mark Sandford
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Public Administration 82
  • Political Science and International Relations 287
  • Urban Studies 65
  • Equine 13
  • Finance 74
Replace Colin Copus with:
Colin Copus United Kingdom
Jim Buller United Kingdom
Howard Elcock United Kingdom
Martin Burch United Kingdom
Gill Bentley United Kingdom
Wyn Grant United Kingdom
Sam Gindin Canada
Bill Dunn United Kingdom
Bertie Russell United Kingdom
Otto Holman Netherlands
Mark Sandford relative to Colin Copus United Kingdom Colin Copus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Colin Copus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Sandford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Sandford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Sandford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Sandford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Sandford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Sandford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Sandford. The network helps show where Mark Sandford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Mark Sandford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Sandford Line = papers co-authored together Mark Sandford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201764
2 201638
3 201330
4 202228
5 201728
6 200521
7 201720
8 201916
9 201615
10 202115
11 201914
12 200213
13 200613
14
Adult Social Care Funding (England)
201812
15 202111
16 200211
17
A commentary on the Regional Government White Paper, Your Region, Your Choice: Revitalising the English Regions
200211
18 201710
19 20189
20 20048

About Mark Sandford

Mark Sandford is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, History, Finance and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 45 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Systems and Governance (18 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (12 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (8 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (7 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (7 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (6 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (5 papers) and Community Development and Social Impact (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (82 citations), Political Science and International Relations (287 citations), Urban Studies (65 citations), Equine (13 citations) and Finance (74 citations). Mark Sandford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Ayres, Matthew Flinders, Laurence Ferry, Meg Russell, Cathy Gormley‐Heenan, James P. Bridges, B.R. Jones, Andrew J. Worth, Scott L. Greer and Graham Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Local Government Studies, Regional Studies, Public Money & Management, Regional & Federal Studies and The Political Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact