Mark S. Tuttle

2.8k total citations
85 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Mark S. Tuttle is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence and Health Information Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark S. Tuttle has authored 85 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 57 papers in Molecular Biology, 46 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 14 papers in Health Information Management. Recurrent topics in Mark S. Tuttle's work include Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (56 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (39 papers) and Electronic Health Records Systems (12 papers). Mark S. Tuttle is often cited by papers focused on Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (56 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (39 papers) and Electronic Health Records Systems (12 papers). Mark S. Tuttle collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ireland and United Kingdom. Mark S. Tuttle's co-authors include Jerry Gravander, Michael Bommer, David D. Sherertz, Mark S. Erlbaum, Stuart J. Nelson, N E Olson, William T. Hole, Steven H. Brown, Peter L. Elkin and Christopher G. Chute and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Cancer and Annals of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Mark S. Tuttle

81 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark S. Tuttle United States	21	896	680	373	306	160	85	1.7k
Hyeoneui Kim United States	21	459 0.5×	543 0.8×	104 0.3×	265 0.9×	23 0.1×	89	2.2k
Petra Knaup Germany	18	436 0.5×	239 0.4×	98 0.3×	687 2.2×	10 0.1×	118	1.4k
Bernd Blobel Germany	21	332 0.4×	471 0.7×	67 0.2×	552 1.8×	19 0.1×	220	1.6k
Betsy L. Humphreys United States	20	1.7k 1.9×	1.4k 2.1×	70 0.2×	494 1.6×	9 0.1×	48	2.7k
Stefan Schulz Germany	22	1.5k 1.7×	1.5k 2.2×	73 0.2×	346 1.1×	10 0.1×	187	2.3k
Gondy Leroy United States	25	331 0.4×	839 1.2×	73 0.2×	70 0.2×	121 0.8×	122	1.8k
Özlem Uzuner United States	37	2.8k 3.1×	4.2k 6.1×	70 0.2×	634 2.1×	35 0.2×	113	5.3k
D. A. B. Lindberg United States	15	1.5k 1.7×	1.3k 1.9×	49 0.1×	415 1.4×	10 0.1×	45	2.2k
John Glaser United States	18	214 0.2×	141 0.2×	149 0.4×	772 2.5×	12 0.1×	68	1.7k
W. Nicholson Price United States	15	360 0.4×	456 0.7×	27 0.1×	152 0.5×	41 0.3×	50	2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark S. Tuttle

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark S. Tuttle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark S. Tuttle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark S. Tuttle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark S. Tuttle

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark S. Tuttle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark S. Tuttle. The network helps show where Mark S. Tuttle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark S. Tuttle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark S. Tuttle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark S. Tuttle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark S. Tuttle. Mark S. Tuttle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Alper, Brian S., Allen Flynn, Bruce E. Bray, et al.. (2021). Categorizing metadata to help mobilize computable biomedical knowledge. Learning Health Systems. 6(1). e10271–e10271. 11 indexed citations

Bradley, Colin, Roy Harper, Patricia M. Kearney, et al.. (2018). Exploring patient information needs in type 2 diabetes: A cross sectional study of questions. PLoS ONE. 13(11). e0203429–e0203429. 19 indexed citations

Tuttle, Mark S., et al.. (2013). EXAMINING NCAA/NFL MARKET EFFICIENCY. Journal of economics and economic education research. 14(3). 67. 2 indexed citations

Nelson, Stuart J., Steven H. Brown, Mark S. Erlbaum, et al.. (2002). A semantic normal form for clinical drugs in the UMLS: early experiences with the VANDF.. PubMed. 557–61. 20 indexed citations

Carter, John S., Steven H. Brown, Stuart J. Nelson, Michael Lincoln, & Mark S. Tuttle. (2001). The Creation and Use of a Reference Terminology for Inter-agency Computer-based Patient Records: The GCPR RTM Demonstration Project. Europe PMC (PubMed Central). 809–809. 1 indexed citations

Elkin, Peter L., et al.. (1998). The role of compositionality in standardized problem list generation.. PubMed. 52 Pt 1. 660–4. 25 indexed citations

Cole, William G., David D. Sherertz, Mark S. Tuttle, et al.. (1997). Metaphrase: Achieving Formalized EMR Problem Lists from Informal Input.. Europe PMC (PubMed Central). 931–931. 2 indexed citations

Fagan, Lawrence M., et al.. (1996). Conversational Access to On-Line Cancer Information: An Adaptable Speech Interface. PubMed Central. 926–926. 3 indexed citations

Olson, N E, et al.. (1996). Suggesting Structural Enhancements to SNOMED International. Europe PMC (PubMed Central). 901–901. 2 indexed citations

10.

Olson, N E, Mark S. Erlbaum, Mark S. Tuttle, et al.. (1996). Exploiting the Metathesaurus Update Model. PubMed Central. 902–902. 5 indexed citations

11.

Tuttle, Mark S., Keith E. Campbell, N E Olson, et al.. (1995). Concept, Code, Term and Word: Preserving the Distinctions. PubMed Central. 956–956. 1 indexed citations

12.

Chute, C. G., Mark S. Tuttle, Ya‐Tang Yang, et al.. (1990). A Preliminary Evaluation of the UMLS Metathesaurus for Patient Record Classification. PubMed Central. 161–165. 8 indexed citations

13.

Tuttle, Mark S., et al.. (1990). Using Meta-1-The 1st Version of the UMLS Metathesaurus.. PubMed Central. 131–135. 11 indexed citations

14.

Sherertz, David D., et al.. (1989). Lexical Mapping in the UMLS Metathesaurus. PubMed Central. 494–499. 10 indexed citations

15.

Sherertz, David D., Mark S. Tuttle, William G. Cole, et al.. (1989). A HyperCard Implementation of Meta-1: The First Version of the UMLS Metathesaurus*.. PubMed Central. 1017–1018. 6 indexed citations

16.

Tuttle, Mark S., et al.. (1989). Updating the UMLS Metathesaurus: A Model. PubMed Central. 488–493. 1 indexed citations

17.

Nelson, Stuart J., David D. Sherertz, Mark S. Erlbaum, & Mark S. Tuttle. (1989). Representing Medical Knowledge in the Form of Structured Text: The Development of Current Disease Descriptions*.. PubMed Central. 66–70. 2 indexed citations

18.

Tuttle, Mark S., David D. Sherertz, Mark S. Erlbaum, N E Olson, & Stuart J. Nelson. (1989). Implementing Meta-1: The First Version of the UMLS Metathesaurus*.. PubMed Central. 483–487. 20 indexed citations

19.

Sherertz, David D., Mark S. Tuttle, M. S. Blois, & Mark S. Erlbaum. (1988). Intervocabulary Mapping Within the UMLS: The Role of Lexical Matching*. PubMed Central. 201–206. 10 indexed citations

20.

Blois, M. S., Mark S. Tuttle, & David D. Sherertz. (1981). RECONSIDER: A Program for Generating Differential Diagnoses *. PubMed Central. 263–268. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact