C. G. Chute

730 total citations
22 papers, 561 citations indexed

About

C. G. Chute is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence and Health Information Management. According to data from OpenAlex, C. G. Chute has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 561 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Molecular Biology, 17 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 5 papers in Health Information Management. Recurrent topics in C. G. Chute's work include Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (20 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (9 papers) and Topic Modeling (7 papers). C. G. Chute is often cited by papers focused on Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (20 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (9 papers) and Topic Modeling (7 papers). C. G. Chute collaborates with scholars based in United States. C. G. Chute's co-authors include Keith E. Campbell, Simon Cohn, Yiming Yang, James R. Campbell, Diane E. Oliver, Serguei Pakhomov, Harold R. Solbrig, David A. Evans, Yiming Yang and Dawn Koltes and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, International Journal of Medical Informatics and Methods of Information in Medicine.

In The Last Decade

C. G. Chute

22 papers receiving 513 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
C. G. Chute United States	14	420	324	175	53	46	22	561
Simon Cohn United States	4	291 0.7×	174 0.5×	171 1.0×	60 1.1×	37 0.8×	5	375
A Rector United Kingdom	11	342 0.8×	304 0.9×	197 1.1×	45 0.8×	16 0.3×	16	513
R.A. Rocha United States	9	315 0.8×	256 0.8×	168 1.0×	19 0.4×	24 0.5×	17	432
Naomi Sager United States	14	369 0.9×	602 1.9×	100 0.6×	44 0.8×	30 0.7×	42	760
Charles Sneiderman United States	10	230 0.5×	162 0.5×	99 0.6×	25 0.5×	25 0.5×	26	370
Mark S. Erlbaum United States	12	370 0.9×	255 0.8×	148 0.8×	31 0.6×	8 0.2×	34	461
David D. Sherertz United States	11	398 0.9×	343 1.1×	137 0.8×	41 0.8×	8 0.2×	39	497
W D Solomon United Kingdom	8	364 0.9×	368 1.1×	91 0.5×	59 1.1×	17 0.4×	14	480
Charles N. Mead United States	10	271 0.6×	141 0.4×	264 1.5×	13 0.2×	96 2.1×	24	528
A M Rassinoux Switzerland	12	307 0.7×	340 1.0×	89 0.5×	40 0.8×	8 0.2×	37	428

Countries citing papers authored by C. G. Chute

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. G. Chute's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. G. Chute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. G. Chute more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. G. Chute

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. G. Chute. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. G. Chute. The network helps show where C. G. Chute may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. G. Chute

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. G. Chute. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. G. Chute based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. G. Chute. C. G. Chute is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Evans, John, Thomas A. Oniki, Joanne Coyle, et al.. (2014). Harmonization of Detailed Clinical Models with Clinical Study Data Standards. Methods of Information in Medicine. 54(1). 65–74. 17 indexed citations

Liu, Hongfang, et al.. (2013). Towards assigning references using semantic, journal and citation relevance. 499–503. 3 indexed citations

Liu, Haibo, Dawn Koltes, Cui Tao, et al.. (2012). Unified Medical Language System term occurrences in clinical notes: a large-scale corpus analysis. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 19(e1). e149–e156. 63 indexed citations

Jiang, Guoqian, Harold R. Solbrig, & C. G. Chute. (2012). Quality evaluation of value sets from cancer study common data elements using the UMLS semantic groups. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 19(e1). e129–e136. 20 indexed citations

Pakhomov, Serguei, et al.. (2005). Developing a corpus of clinical notes manually annotated for part-of-speech. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 75(6). 418–429. 33 indexed citations

Chute, C. G.. (2005). Classification And Retrieval Of Patient Records Using Natural Language: An Experimental Application Of Latent Semantic Analysis. 14. 1162–1163. 1 indexed citations

Elkin, Peter L., Steven H. Brown, & C. G. Chute. (2001). Guideline for health informatics: controlled health vocabularies--vocabulary structure and high-level indicators.. PubMed. 84(Pt 1). 191–5. 8 indexed citations

Graves, Judith, et al.. (2000). Embedded Structures and Representation of Nursing Knowledge. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 7(6). 539–549. 22 indexed citations

Graves, Judith, et al.. (2000). The content coverage and organizational structure of terminologies: the example of postoperative pain.. PubMed. 335–9. 9 indexed citations

10.

Cohn, Simon, et al.. (1998). Scalable Methodologies for Distributed Development of Logic-Based Convergent Medical Terminology. Methods of Information in Medicine. 37(04/05). 426–439. 37 indexed citations

11.

Chute, C. G.. (1998). The Copernican era of healthcare terminology: a re-centering of health information systems.. PubMed. 68–73. 16 indexed citations

12.

Chute, C. G., Simon Cohn, Keith E. Campbell, Diane E. Oliver, & James R. Campbell. (1996). The Content Coverage of Clinical Classifications. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 3(3). 224–233. 174 indexed citations

13.

Yang, Yiming & C. G. Chute. (1993). Words or concepts: the features of indexing units and their optimal use in information retrieval.. PubMed. 685–9. 20 indexed citations

14.

Chute, C. G. & Yiming Yang. (1992). An evaluation of concept based latent semantic indexing for clinical information retrieval.. PubMed. 639–43. 15 indexed citations

15.

Yang, Yiming & C. G. Chute. (1992). An application of least squares fit mapping to clinical classification.. PubMed. 460–4. 12 indexed citations

16.

Chute, C. G., et al.. (1991). A schematic analysis of the Unified Medical Language System.. PubMed. 204–8. 8 indexed citations

17.

Chute, C. G., Yiming Yang, & David A. Evans. (1991). Latent Semantic Indexing of medical diagnoses using UMLS semantic structures.. PubMed. 185–9. 30 indexed citations

18.

Tuttle, Mark S., David D. Sherertz, Mark S. Erlbaum, et al.. (1991). Adding your terms and relationships to the UMLS Metathesaurus.. PubMed. 219–23. 29 indexed citations

19.

Chute, C. G.. (1991). The Classification of Medical Events Using Latent Semantic Analysis. 2(1). 1 indexed citations

20.

Chute, C. G., Mark S. Tuttle, Ya‐Tang Yang, et al.. (1990). A Preliminary Evaluation of the UMLS Metathesaurus for Patient Record Classification. PubMed Central. 161–165. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact