Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
What is Social Learning?
20101.1k citationsMark S. Reed, Jayne Glass et al.profile →
Have farmers had enough of experts?
2021104 citationsNiki Rust, Rebecca M. Jarvis et al.Environmental Managementprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jayne Glass's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jayne Glass with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jayne Glass more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jayne Glass. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jayne Glass. The network helps show where Jayne Glass may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jayne Glass
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jayne Glass.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jayne Glass based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jayne Glass. Jayne Glass is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rust, Niki, Rebecca M. Jarvis, Jasper R. de Vries, et al.. (2021). Have farmers had enough of experts?. Environmental Management. 69(1). 31–44.104 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Glass, Jayne, Mark Shucksmith, Polly Chapman, & Jane Atterton. (2021). Covid-19, lockdowns and financial hardship in rural areas: Insights from the Rural Lives project.2 indexed citations
10.
Glass, Jayne, et al.. (2020). Land Reform in Scotland. Edinburgh University Press eBooks.5 indexed citations
11.
Glass, Jayne, et al.. (2020). Children and young people and rural poverty and social exclusion: A review of evidence. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).1 indexed citations
12.
Atterton, Jane, et al.. (2020). The role of the LEADER approach post-Brexit.1 indexed citations
13.
Glass, Jayne, Rob McMorran, & Steven Thomson. (2019). The effects associated with concentrated and large-scale land ownership in Scotland: a research review.5 indexed citations
14.
Pollard, Katherine, et al.. (2019). Investigation into the issues associated with large scale and concentrated landownership in Scotland.3 indexed citations
15.
McMorran, Rob, et al.. (2018). Review of the effectiveness of current community ownership mechanisms and of options for supporting the expansion of community ownership in Scotland. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde).2 indexed citations
16.
Glass, Jayne, et al.. (2018). Research on interventions to manage land markets and limit the concentration of land ownership elsewhere in the world.2 indexed citations
17.
Thomson, Steven, Rob McMorran, & Jayne Glass. (2018). Socio-economic and biodiversity impacts of driven grouse moors in Scotland: Part 1: Socio-economic impacts of driven grouse moors in Scotland.2 indexed citations
Glass, Jayne, Alister Scott, & Martin F. Price. (2011). Developing a Sustainability Assessment Tool for Upland Estates. 425–428.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.