Mark Pingle

34 papers receiving 265 citations

Peers

Mark Pingle
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • General Decision Sciences 64
  • Safety Research 106
  • Management Science and Operations Research 73
  • Economics and Econometrics 148
  • Sociology and Political Science 85
Replace Daniela Di Cagno with:
Daniela Di Cagno Italy
Nadja Dwenger Germany
S. Nageeb Ali United States
Angela A. Hung United States
Hugh Schwartz United States
J. Atsu Amegashie Canada
Collin Raymond United States
Siegfried K. Berninghaus Germany
Sera Linardi United States
Sotiris Georganas United Kingdom
Mark Pingle relative to Daniela Di Cagno Italy Daniela Di Cagno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Daniela Di Cagno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Pingle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Pingle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Pingle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Pingle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Pingle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Pingle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Pingle. The network helps show where Mark Pingle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Mark Pingle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Pingle Line = papers co-authored together Mark Pingle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199661
2 199554
3 200237
4 199232
5 199711
6 20049
7 20069
8 20049
9 20007
10 20017
11 19957
12
To support trust and trustworthiness: punish, communicate, both, neither?
20176
13 20126
14 20186
15 19915
16 20104
17 20093
18 20193
19
Economic justification for a public school of pharmacy: lessons for Nevada.
20052
20
Walras' Law, Pareto Efficiency, and Intermediation in Overlapping Generations Economies
19942

About Mark Pingle

Mark Pingle is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Safety Research, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 41 papers that have together received 300 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (17 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (12 papers), Economic theories and models (11 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (7 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (5 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (3 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (3 papers) and Economic Theory and Institutions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (64 citations), Safety Research (106 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (73 citations), Economics and Econometrics (148 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (85 citations). Mark Pingle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Richard H. Day, Mike Mitchell, Leigh Tesfatsion, W. Bentley MacLeod, Tigran Melkonyan, Mark W. Nichols, Thomas F. Cargill, Gary Charness, James Rogers and R Sullivan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Journal of Economic Psychology, Public Choice, Journal of Economic Issues and Journal of Gambling Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026